Astrology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe
mNo edit summary
imported>Brian P. Long
(removed contradictory claim from main page; see Talk)
Line 8: Line 8:
Astrologers utilize some astronomical calculations, but otherwise, astrology-- in ancient times, unified with it--is now divorced from astronomy.  Fisher suggests the divorce relates to the invention of the telescope which revealed that the Sun, and not the Earth, is the center of the solar system.<ref>Fisher, Gordon:  ''Marriage and Divorce of Astronomy and Astrology,'' Lulu.com, 2002, p. 182</ref> However, other writers highlight the broader fundamental conflict between religion and science and the general dominance of scientifically influenced world views.<ref>Jastrow, Morris , ''The Study of Religion,'' W. Scot, 1902 p  308</ref><ref>David Pingree in: Wiener, Philip P., ''The Dictionary of the History of Ideas,'' Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1973-74, p. 126</ref> Lakotos makes the cleavage of world views more specific by noting that astrology is not "logically derivable from shared premises."  <ref>Lakatos, Imre & Alan Musgrave, ''Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,'' Cambridge University Press, 1970 p. 9</ref>
Astrologers utilize some astronomical calculations, but otherwise, astrology-- in ancient times, unified with it--is now divorced from astronomy.  Fisher suggests the divorce relates to the invention of the telescope which revealed that the Sun, and not the Earth, is the center of the solar system.<ref>Fisher, Gordon:  ''Marriage and Divorce of Astronomy and Astrology,'' Lulu.com, 2002, p. 182</ref> However, other writers highlight the broader fundamental conflict between religion and science and the general dominance of scientifically influenced world views.<ref>Jastrow, Morris , ''The Study of Religion,'' W. Scot, 1902 p  308</ref><ref>David Pingree in: Wiener, Philip P., ''The Dictionary of the History of Ideas,'' Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1973-74, p. 126</ref> Lakotos makes the cleavage of world views more specific by noting that astrology is not "logically derivable from shared premises."  <ref>Lakatos, Imre & Alan Musgrave, ''Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,'' Cambridge University Press, 1970 p. 9</ref>


The scientific community generally considers astrology as a [[pseudoscience]] or superstition.  There is no widely accepted scientific evidence for the validity of astrology, though numerous modern researches have conducted statistical studies, some of which support the hypothesis of astrological influences.  A review of these may be found in ''Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A Critical Review, 1900-1976.'' <ref>Dr. Dean, Geoffrey, & Arthur Mather BSc, ''Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A Critical Review, 1900-1976,'' </ref>  See also:  ''The tenacious Mars Effect,'' <ref>Dr. Ertel, Suibert, & Kenneth Irving, ''The tenacious Mars Effect,'' Urania Trust, 1996</ref> and ''Cosmic Influences on Humans, Animals, and Plants, An Annotated Bibliography"<ref>Dr Burns, John T., ''Cosmic Influences on Humans, Animals, and Plants, An Annotated Bibliography,'' Scarecrow Press, Inc. 1997</ref>
The scientific community generally considers astrology as a [[pseudoscience]] or superstition, and there is no widely accepted scientific evidence for the validity of astrology.


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 17:20, 15 September 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Astrology&printable=yes
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Astrology (from Greek αστήρ, αστρός, astér, astrós, "star", and λόγος, λόγου, lógos, lógou, "word, reason", hence -logia "study of") [1] consists of belief systems and practices that relate the patterns and positions of celestial bodies to human personality, human affairs, and all terrestrial events.[2] Some modern writers such as Alice Bailey and Allan Oken[1] also relate astrology to the soul. In astrology, the patterns of human life and nature in general are seen as correspondent with celestial patterns, specifically with the position and movement of the Sun and planetary bodies as they appear against the backdrop of the Zodiac as viewed from Earth. This is expressed in the fundamental astrological axiom, "As above, so below." [2] Many traditions and applications of astrological concepts have arisen since its earliest recorded beginnings. Beck and Denison cite Greek astrology of 410 BC as well as the earlier Babylonia astrology of about 3,500 BC. [3] [4]Astrology was practiced in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamian [5]

Advocates have defined astrology as a symbolic language, an art form, a science, and a method of divination.[6][7] The connotation of "science" in astrology is based on its roots in ancient astronomy. (See Tycho Brahe, and Ptolemy.) But astrology has more relationship to religion,[3] mythology, psychology, and philosophy, than to the physical science of astronomy. In this connection Pengree writes that astrological influences, "...indicate trends which may be changed by future astral influences or by the intervention of a super-natural being, usually on the pleading or at the behest of an astrologer or of a priest." [8]

Astrologers utilize some astronomical calculations, but otherwise, astrology-- in ancient times, unified with it--is now divorced from astronomy. Fisher suggests the divorce relates to the invention of the telescope which revealed that the Sun, and not the Earth, is the center of the solar system.[9] However, other writers highlight the broader fundamental conflict between religion and science and the general dominance of scientifically influenced world views.[10][11] Lakotos makes the cleavage of world views more specific by noting that astrology is not "logically derivable from shared premises." [12]

The scientific community generally considers astrology as a pseudoscience or superstition, and there is no widely accepted scientific evidence for the validity of astrology.

References

  1. ↑ Oken, Alan, Soul-Centered Astrology, Doubleday , 1990
  2. ↑ Bobrick, Benson: The Fated Sky: Astrology in History, Simon and Schuster, 2006, p. 23
  3. ↑ Beck, Roger, A Brief History of Ancient Astrology, Blackwell Publishing, 2007, p. 12, 14
  4. ↑ Denison , Stephen, The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, Jameson & Morse, 1905
  5. ↑ Charles George Herbermann, et al. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Appleton Co., 1913 p. 19
  6. ↑ The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encyclopaedia Britannica,' v.5, 1974, p. 916
  7. ↑ Dietrich, Thomas: 'The Origin of Culture and Civilization, Phenix & Phenix Literary Publicists, 2005, p. 305
  8. ↑ David Pingree in: Wiener, Philip P., The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1973-74, p. 118
  9. ↑ Fisher, Gordon: Marriage and Divorce of Astronomy and Astrology, Lulu.com, 2002, p. 182
  10. ↑ Jastrow, Morris , The Study of Religion, W. Scot, 1902 p 308
  11. ↑ David Pingree in: Wiener, Philip P., The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1973-74, p. 126
  12. ↑ Lakatos, Imre & Alan Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1970 p. 9
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Astrology&oldid=301274"