CZ Talk:Core Articles/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger (Please dive in!) |
imported>Chris Day (transfer discussion to this page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Dive in!== | == Dive in!== | ||
Please dive in! I've put the initiative before the Editorial Council for approval "by acclamation"--I doubt anyone will have any objection. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:16, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | Please dive in! I've put the initiative before the Editorial Council for approval "by acclamation"--I doubt anyone will have any objection. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:16, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
==biology core articles== | |||
# [[Acid-base physiology]] | |||
# [[Adaptability]] | |||
# [[Adipose tissue biology]] | |||
# [[Adenovirus]] | |||
# [[Adrenal physiology]] | |||
# [[Aging]] | |||
# [[Amino acid metabolism and function]] | |||
# [[Animism]] | |||
# [[Ant]] | |||
# [[Antigen]] (microstub) | |||
# [[Apocrine gland physiology]] | |||
# [[Arterial system]] | |||
# [[Oswald T. Avery]] (DNA as the genetic material) | |||
# [[Baboon]] | |||
# [[Bear]] | |||
# [[Bioterrorism]] | |||
# [[Bone]] | |||
# [[Comte de Buffon]] | |||
# [[Butterfly]] | |||
I'll have to learn the wiki coding, but here find some potential "Core" articles starting with letter "A"--[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] [[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian|(Talk)]] 20:28, 20 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Well, bear in mind that on the proposal in question, there are only 200 articles in each of Biology and Health Sciences--and they have to be the 200 "core," most important, articles. I suspect there would be a lot more than 200 biology articles if you were to continue the list at that level of specialization. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:34, 20 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Agree re "core" concept. Thinking to make a draft list of ''potential'' core topics biology, then cull to a 200 core by consensus of Workgroup. --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] [[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian|(Talk)]] 19:22, 21 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Exactly what I hoped you'd do. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:00, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Anthony, don't forget we already have a list high priority articles that has been whittled down somewhat ([[CZ:Biology_Workgroup#High_priority_articles]]). Another source of our most wanted articles is on the [[Biology/Related Articles]] subpage. I suggest we put out list together on the workgroup page and gain a a consensus onm our 200 unwritten articles. I'm sure we could all come up very different lists. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 09:45, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:26, 25 September 2007
Dive in!
Please dive in! I've put the initiative before the Editorial Council for approval "by acclamation"--I doubt anyone will have any objection. --Larry Sanger 10:16, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
biology core articles
- Acid-base physiology
- Adaptability
- Adipose tissue biology
- Adenovirus
- Adrenal physiology
- Aging
- Amino acid metabolism and function
- Animism
- Ant
- Antigen (microstub)
- Apocrine gland physiology
- Arterial system
- Oswald T. Avery (DNA as the genetic material)
- Baboon
- Bear
- Bioterrorism
- Bone
- Comte de Buffon
- Butterfly
I'll have to learn the wiki coding, but here find some potential "Core" articles starting with letter "A"--Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 20:28, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
Well, bear in mind that on the proposal in question, there are only 200 articles in each of Biology and Health Sciences--and they have to be the 200 "core," most important, articles. I suspect there would be a lot more than 200 biology articles if you were to continue the list at that level of specialization. --Larry Sanger 20:34, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
Agree re "core" concept. Thinking to make a draft list of potential core topics biology, then cull to a 200 core by consensus of Workgroup. --Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 19:22, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Exactly what I hoped you'd do. --Larry Sanger 10:00, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
- Anthony, don't forget we already have a list high priority articles that has been whittled down somewhat (CZ:Biology_Workgroup#High_priority_articles). Another source of our most wanted articles is on the Biology/Related Articles subpage. I suggest we put out list together on the workgroup page and gain a a consensus onm our 200 unwritten articles. I'm sure we could all come up very different lists. Chris Day (talk) 09:45, 25 September 2007 (CDT)