Talk:Authors of the Bible: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell Potter (Nature of claims -- organization of entry) |
imported>Russell Potter |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There are a number of questions raised by this entry. | There are a number of questions raised by this entry. | ||
First off, is this going to be a list of what historical scholarship into the origins of the Bible has produced? If so, rather than organizing it by all the books of the | First off, is this going to be a list of what historical scholarship into the origins of the Bible has produced? If so, rather than organizing it by all the books of the most commonly accepted Christian Biblical canon, it would seem to make much ''more'' sense to organized it by the '''authors''' as historically adduced. Thus, we should have sections on the [[Elohist]], the [[Yahwist]], and other Old Testament authors, along with the same treatment of the New Testament, with sections on the [[Q document]] and so forth. | ||
Or, is this going to be a summary of the authors of Biblical texts as believed in by Jews or Christians? That is, are we to imagine that Moses wrote the books of Moses, Solomon wrote the Song of Solomon, and so forth. If so, then, we have an important [[CZ:Neutrality]] issue, as it will take a great deal of time and effort to craft neutral statements about what different faiths believe. | Or, is this going to be a summary of the authors of Biblical texts as believed in by Jews or Christians? That is, are we to imagine that Moses wrote the books of Moses, Solomon wrote the Song of Solomon, and so forth. If so, then, we have an important [[CZ:Neutrality]] issue, as it will take a great deal of time and effort to craft neutral statements about what different faiths believe. | ||
Or will this just be a catalog of popular notions about the authors of the Bible? That wouldn't, by itself, be to my mind a useful entry for an encyclopedia, unless under a different title such as "Popular conceptions of the Bible." [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 11:01, 24 June 2007 (CDT) | Or will this just be a catalog of popular notions about the authors of the Bible? That wouldn't, by itself, be to my mind a useful entry for an encyclopedia, unless under a different title such as "Popular conceptions of the Bible." [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 11:01, 24 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:02, 24 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Religion Workgroup, Literature Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Michael Yates 23:23, 21 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I have started this article, which is suggested by the Books of the Bible article. It is very much in draft stage and is open to input by anyone. My first goal is to give a brief summary of support for the most popular author of each book, then to go back over it in more detail with more research. Suggestions are welcome. Michael Yates 23:19, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
Nature of claims -- organization of entry
There are a number of questions raised by this entry.
First off, is this going to be a list of what historical scholarship into the origins of the Bible has produced? If so, rather than organizing it by all the books of the most commonly accepted Christian Biblical canon, it would seem to make much more sense to organized it by the authors as historically adduced. Thus, we should have sections on the Elohist, the Yahwist, and other Old Testament authors, along with the same treatment of the New Testament, with sections on the Q document and so forth.
Or, is this going to be a summary of the authors of Biblical texts as believed in by Jews or Christians? That is, are we to imagine that Moses wrote the books of Moses, Solomon wrote the Song of Solomon, and so forth. If so, then, we have an important CZ:Neutrality issue, as it will take a great deal of time and effort to craft neutral statements about what different faiths believe.
Or will this just be a catalog of popular notions about the authors of the Bible? That wouldn't, by itself, be to my mind a useful entry for an encyclopedia, unless under a different title such as "Popular conceptions of the Bible." Russell Potter 11:01, 24 June 2007 (CDT)
- Religion Category Check
- General Category Check
- Literature Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Religion Advanced Articles
- Religion Nonstub Articles
- Religion Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Religion Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Religion Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Religion Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Religion External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Religion Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Religion Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Literature Cleanup
- Cleanup