User:Russell Potter/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter mNo edit summary |
imported>Russell Potter mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* An Approved entry should be readable, engaging, and informative. | * An Approved entry should be readable, engaging, and informative. | ||
* An Approved entry should be free of any obvious grammatical errors | * An Approved entry should be free of any obvious grammatical errors (bearing in mind that we do not want to eliminate stylistic touches, | ||
simply make sure the prose scans well). | simply make sure the prose scans well). | ||
Revision as of 11:18, 13 June 2007
DISCLAIMER: NOTHING HERE IS ANY SORT OF OFFICIAL OR FINISHED DOCUMENT OF ANY KIND'
Possible set of rubrics or criteria which might be suggested for Approval help:
- An Approved entry should be readable, engaging, and informative.
- An Approved entry should be free of any obvious grammatical errors (bearing in mind that we do not want to eliminate stylistic touches,
simply make sure the prose scans well).
- An Approved entry should be clearly formatted, with illustrations in
places where needed, and at a size that enabled the text to be followed easily
- An Approved entry should offer, when appropriate, sources for
further reading, and links to useful and reasonably reliable external information.
- An Approved article need not be absolutely complete or encompassing
of every possible aspect of its subject. It should, however, be at least a 'step in the right direction,' giving the basic facts and able to stand independently. There will always be room for further refinement!