Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen (→Skin: comment) |
imported>Jeffrey Scott Bernstein (→Skin) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:No, I ''really'' do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much. Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT) | :No, I ''really'' do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much. Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::My two cents: I agree completely with John Stephenson about the relevance to the reference to nudity. (And this is not because I think Jennifer is very pretty, haha.) The truth is the truth; we can't help it, can we? What we can do, as he says well, is pay due attention to the "tasteful".[[User:Jeffrey Scott Bernstein|Jeffrey Scott Bernstein]] 05:27, 14 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 04:27, 14 October 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Media Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Derek Harkness 08:05, 6 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Need to add a checklist here... --Larry Sanger 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- Done. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Skin
I did remove that link because it's possibly a violation of our family-friendly policy, or at least in bad taste. I removed the Wikipedia link as well, since we don't want to be sending Jen fans there! I'm not sure about removing references to nudity, though - one could argue that it is significant that Ms Hewitt has seen an artistic need for such a scene only once in her career. To that end, I see no reason why such information could not be included, provided it is mentioned tastefully and in context. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
- No, I really do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much. Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
- My two cents: I agree completely with John Stephenson about the relevance to the reference to nudity. (And this is not because I think Jennifer is very pretty, haha.) The truth is the truth; we can't help it, can we? What we can do, as he says well, is pay due attention to the "tasteful".Jeffrey Scott Bernstein 05:27, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Media Category Check
- General Category Check
- Topic Informant Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Media Advanced Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Advanced Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Media Developed Articles
- Topic Informant Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Topic Informant Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Media Stub Articles
- Topic Informant Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Media External Articles
- Topic Informant External Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Topic Informant Underlinked Articles
- Media Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Topic Informant Cleanup
- Cleanup