Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
(→‎Skin: comment)
imported>Jeffrey Scott Bernstein
Line 17: Line 17:


:No, I ''really'' do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much.  Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say.   —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
:No, I ''really'' do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much.  Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say.   —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
::My two cents: I agree completely with John Stephenson about the relevance to the reference to nudity. (And this is not because I think Jennifer is very pretty, haha.) The truth is the truth; we can't help it, can we? What we can do, as he says well, is pay due attention to the "tasteful".[[User:Jeffrey Scott Bernstein|Jeffrey Scott Bernstein]] 05:27, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:27, 14 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Jennifer Love Hewitt"
Workgroup category or categories Media Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 08:05, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Need to add a checklist here... --Larry Sanger 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Done. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

Skin

I did remove that link because it's possibly a violation of our family-friendly policy, or at least in bad taste. I removed the Wikipedia link as well, since we don't want to be sending Jen fans there! I'm not sure about removing references to nudity, though - one could argue that it is significant that Ms Hewitt has seen an artistic need for such a scene only once in her career. To that end, I see no reason why such information could not be included, provided it is mentioned tastefully and in context. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

No, I really do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much. Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
My two cents: I agree completely with John Stephenson about the relevance to the reference to nudity. (And this is not because I think Jennifer is very pretty, haha.) The truth is the truth; we can't help it, can we? What we can do, as he says well, is pay due attention to the "tasteful".Jeffrey Scott Bernstein 05:27, 14 October 2007 (CDT)