Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Derek Harkness
(Article checklist)
imported>John Stephenson
(Should we be removing info on nudity?)
Line 11: Line 11:
}}
}}
Need to add a checklist here... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
Need to add a checklist here... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
:Done. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
==Skin==
I did remove that link because it's possibly a violation of our family-friendly policy, or at least in bad taste. I removed the Wikipedia link as well, since we don't want to be sending Jen fans there! I'm not sure about removing references to nudity, though - one could argue that it is significant that Ms Hewitt has seen an artistic need for such a scene only once in her career. To that end, I see no reason why such information could not be included, provided it is mentioned tastefully and in context. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:43, 14 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Jennifer Love Hewitt"
Workgroup category or categories Media Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 08:05, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Need to add a checklist here... --Larry Sanger 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Done. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)

Skin

I did remove that link because it's possibly a violation of our family-friendly policy, or at least in bad taste. I removed the Wikipedia link as well, since we don't want to be sending Jen fans there! I'm not sure about removing references to nudity, though - one could argue that it is significant that Ms Hewitt has seen an artistic need for such a scene only once in her career. To that end, I see no reason why such information could not be included, provided it is mentioned tastefully and in context. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)