Talk:Social class: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger m (Talk:Social Class moved to Talk:Social class: Usually used in lowercase --> article title is lowercase) |
imported>Wahib Frank ("ly" - typo or acronym?) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT) | I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::the links are still there. The best way is to have links on the other pages pointing to [[Social Class]]--this article. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:50, 8 May 2007 (CDT) | ::the links are still there. The best way is to have links on the other pages pointing to [[Social Class]]--this article. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:50, 8 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== "ly" - typo or acronym? == | |||
"Iy was invented in the 1960s": If an acronym, is an explanation in order for a non-expert audience (eg: me), or is this a typo? [[User:Wahib Frank|Wahib Frank]] 05:48, 11 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 04:48, 11 May 2007
Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." Frank W Sweet 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- entire article by CZ editor RJensen, so no need for Wiki reference. Richard Jensen 19:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? Frank W Sweet 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- the links are still there. The best way is to have links on the other pages pointing to Social Class--this article. Richard Jensen 20:50, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
"ly" - typo or acronym?
"Iy was invented in the 1960s": If an acronym, is an explanation in order for a non-expert audience (eg: me), or is this a typo? Wahib Frank 05:48, 11 May 2007 (CDT)