Talk:Archaeology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Richard Nevell (Thoughts on structure) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Lee R. Berger|Lee R. Berger]] 13:17, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Lee R. Berger|Lee R. Berger]] 13:17, 14 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Structure== | |||
Thinking about how this article could developed, it needs a section on the history of archaeology (ie: how the study developed), archaeological techniques (including drawing, photography, geophysics, excavation, and dating), and the role of archaeology in historical studies. [[User:Richard Nevell|Richard Nevell]] 22:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 18 September 2012
Since we are already on this and in most countries Archeology (Archaeology) falls under anthro - can we subsume this completely under our CZ:Anthropology Workgroupworkgroup?
Lee R. Berger 12:57, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
Maybe. You might ask if the two Archaeology Workgroup editors have any objection. I don't, personally. --Larry Sanger 13:04, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
- I shall await their reply!
Lee R. Berger 13:17, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
Structure
Thinking about how this article could developed, it needs a section on the history of archaeology (ie: how the study developed), archaeological techniques (including drawing, photography, geophysics, excavation, and dating), and the role of archaeology in historical studies. Richard Nevell 22:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)