CZ:Approval Announcements: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati
imported>Nancy Sculerati
Line 5: Line 5:
What's needed? (All registered users should feel free to add to & edit this list)
What's needed? (All registered users should feel free to add to & edit this list)


* Appoved articles need a look that tells the user that he or she is reading an approved article
* Approved articles need a look that tells the user that he or she is reading an approved article


* A conventional means of indicating important facts (such as nominating editor- date approved) is also needed
* A conventional means of indicating important facts (such as nominating editor- date approved) is also needed
Line 18: Line 18:
*Should there be a Group Approval Template? [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,392.0.html]
*Should there be a Group Approval Template? [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,392.0.html]


===Invitation to link sandbox trials here===


Perhaps drafts of templates and styles for approved articles might be linked here?





Revision as of 05:34, 27 April 2007

April 27, 2007

This announcement is for the wiki hackers among us- the skin for Approved articles needs a facial.

What's needed? (All registered users should feel free to add to & edit this list)

  • Approved articles need a look that tells the user that he or she is reading an approved article
  • A conventional means of indicating important facts (such as nominating editor- date approved) is also needed

What's been said so far?

Here are threads on the forum that all deserve our attention (please add to these):

  • Re: Proof versions of articles« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2007, 04:43:23 PM »[1]
  • Should there be a Group Approval Template? [2]

Invitation to link sandbox trials here

Perhaps drafts of templates and styles for approved articles might be linked here?


April 26, 2007

Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval (or indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):

Copying Jason's post from the Forums [3]: I have a favor to ask of the History Workgroup. The article First Punic War appears high on Google searches. It has been steadily climibing, currently 10 to 12 in rank on a search for first punic war. If this article can be pushed along to approved status, this would be good PR. -Jason Potkanski Tech Lead


April 24, 2007

Our first of the Tuesday Night Rundowns on approved articles begins! Our first set of announcements is itself an "announcement of firsts".


Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval (or indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):

Calling Mathematics editors to review:

These are candidates for our first Mathematics articles for nomination. Where are our editors?


Articles newly nominated for approval:

Humanities

CZ:Workgroups#Humanities

Our very first History articles to be nominated!


Just Approved Articles

CZ:Workgroups#Applied Arts and Sciences
  • Infant colic Our very first Health Sciences article to be approved!