Medical testing on animals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell m (Big Cleanup - categories) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove any categories (details)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
Normally, prior to the testing of new substances on humans, they are tested on animals. | Normally, prior to the testing of new substances on humans, they are tested on animals. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
Harm to other beings for our benefit. | Harm to other beings for our benefit. | ||
Possible infringement of rights. | Possible infringement of rights. | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 10 November 2007
Normally, prior to the testing of new substances on humans, they are tested on animals.
The reason for this is to see whether there are any adverse effects.
There is international legislation in place that requires this to be the case, but it remains to be seen whether the entire world will follow this.
The area has been a point of controversy for almost two centuries, with the animal rights movement starting in Great Britain.
Reasons for animal testing
Safety of subsequent human subjects and users. Gains in field of veterinary medicine. Benefits to medicine.
Reasons against animal testing
Harm to other beings for our benefit. Possible infringement of rights.