User talk:Michael Johnson: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Johnson
No edit summary
imported>Michael Johnson
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


[[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 18:27, 4 February 2007 (CST)
[[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 18:27, 4 February 2007 (CST)
there are no policemen here
there are no policemen here
those you see as police merely maintain the integrity, and get rid of garbage entered by not such nice visitors. The only ones that have actual saying here are the editors and authors, where as editors - when agreeing - have a deciding vote over the scientific 'value' of any article.
those you see as police merely maintain the integrity, and get rid of garbage entered by not such nice visitors. The only ones that have actual saying here are the editors and authors, where as editors - when agreeing - have a deciding vote over the scientific 'value' of any article.

Revision as of 20:17, 4 February 2007

Citizendium Getting Started
Join | Quick Start | About us | Help system | How to start a new article | For Wikipedians
How to Edit
Getting Started Organization Technical Help
Policies Content Policy
 


Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitionsadd metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

Robert Tito | Talk 18:27, 4 February 2007 (CST)

there are no policemen here those you see as police merely maintain the integrity, and get rid of garbage entered by not such nice visitors. The only ones that have actual saying here are the editors and authors, where as editors - when agreeing - have a deciding vote over the scientific 'value' of any article. Too bad you can't find yourself welcome in such a system, where the only reason is to be and becomd scientifically better than WP, and above all more reliable.

Hope you will return here, cheers Robert Tito | Talk 18:53, 4 February 2007 (CST) It was no bot