Talk:History of philosophy of science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter J. King (merge with Philosophy of science?) |
imported>Aleksander Stos m (checklisted) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = History_of_philosophy_of_science | |||
| cat1 = Philosophy | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 3 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = --[[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 09:13, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST) | This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Should this not be part of the [[Philosophy of science]] article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | Should this not be part of the [[Philosophy of science]] article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:13, 19 July 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Aleksander Stos 09:13, 19 July 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form History of Philosophy, and Philosophy of Science. --Matthias Brendel 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST)
Should this not be part of the Philosophy of science article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --Peter J. King Talk 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Philosophy Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup