Talk:Ancient Rome: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>James Hare (forum romanum) |
imported>Robert Mack No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Rome, Ancient | |||
| cat1 = History | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = yes | |||
| status = 3 | |||
| underlinked = yes | |||
| cleanup = no | |||
| by = Robert Mack | |||
}} | |||
==Forum Romanum== | ==Forum Romanum== | ||
This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? [[User:James Hare|James Hare]] 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST) | This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? [[User:James Hare|James Hare]] 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 02:58, 20 December 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Robert Mack |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Forum Romanum
This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? James Hare 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup