CZ Talk:Workgroups: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ZachPruckowski |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Alphabetical == | |||
:[[Agriculture]] | |||
:[[Anthropology ]] | |||
:[[Archaeology]] | |||
:[[Architecture]] | |||
:[[Astronomy]] | |||
:[[Biology]] | |||
:[[Business]] | |||
:[[Classics]] | |||
:[[Chemistry ]] | |||
:[[Computers ]] | |||
:[[Earth Sciences]] | |||
:[[Economics]] | |||
:[[Education]] | |||
:[[Energy]] | |||
:[[Engineering]] | |||
:[[Games]] and [[Hobbies]] | |||
:[[Geography]] | |||
:[[Health Sciences]] | |||
:[[History ]] | |||
:[[Journalism]] | |||
:[[Law]] | |||
:[[Library and Information Science]] | |||
:[[Linguistics]] | |||
:[[Literature]] | |||
:[[Mathematics]] | |||
:[[Media]] | |||
:[[Military]] | |||
:[[Music]] | |||
:[[Philosophy]] | |||
:[[Physics]] | |||
:[[Politics]] | |||
:[[Psychology]] | |||
:[[Religion]] | |||
:[[Sociology]] | |||
:[[Sports]] | |||
:[[Technology]] | |||
:[[Theater]] | |||
:[[Visual Arts]] | |||
==On Proposed Grouping - Natural Science== | ==On Proposed Grouping - Natural Science== | ||
Should Health Science(s) not be a part of "Biology"? [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]] 23:14, 13 November 2006 (CST) | Should Health Science(s) not be a part of "Biology"? [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]] 23:14, 13 November 2006 (CST) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 47: | ||
should point to the "Category' with that title rather than the specific page with that title! [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]] 23:18, 13 November 2006 (CST) | should point to the "Category' with that title rather than the specific page with that title! [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]] 23:18, 13 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:The goal is to at some point revamp categories, or do away with them on the user page. Ideally before we go live. Therefore, it's better to have the main pages for each workgroup be well done. --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 07:56, 14 November 2006 (CST) | :The goal is to at some point revamp categories, or do away with them on the user page. Ideally before we go live. Therefore, it's better to have the main pages for each workgroup be well done. --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 07:56, 14 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:Actually, we want several columns in a table: the article page (e.g., [[Philosophy]]); the workgroup homepage (e.g., [[CZ:Philosophy Workgroup]]; the article category page (e.g., [[:Category:Philosophy Workgroup]]); the editor category page (e.g., [[CZ:Philosophy Editors]]; maybe an author category page (e.g., [[CZ:Philosophy authors]]). | |||
:By the way, I much prefer "[[:Category:Philosophy Workgroup]]" to "[[:Category:Philosophy]]," because what we are categorizing are not articles, but which workgroup has responsibility for which articles. This is an important difference! We don't want all and only articles that happened to be categorized "Philosophy" articles by Wikipedia necessarily to be managed by our own Philosophy workgroup. For this we make our own decisions. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:30, 19 November 2006 (CST) | |||
== Business == | == Business == | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 19 November 2006
Alphabetical
- Agriculture
- Anthropology
- Archaeology
- Architecture
- Astronomy
- Biology
- Business
- Classics
- Chemistry
- Computers
- Earth Sciences
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- Engineering
- Games and Hobbies
- Geography
- Health Sciences
- History
- Journalism
- Law
- Library and Information Science
- Linguistics
- Literature
- Mathematics
- Media
- Military
- Music
- Philosophy
- Physics
- Politics
- Psychology
- Religion
- Sociology
- Sports
- Technology
- Theater
- Visual Arts
On Proposed Grouping - Natural Science
Should Health Science(s) not be a part of "Biology"? Supten 23:14, 13 November 2006 (CST)
Discipline Workgroups
should point to the "Category' with that title rather than the specific page with that title! Supten 23:18, 13 November 2006 (CST)
- The goal is to at some point revamp categories, or do away with them on the user page. Ideally before we go live. Therefore, it's better to have the main pages for each workgroup be well done. --ZachPruckowski 07:56, 14 November 2006 (CST)
- Actually, we want several columns in a table: the article page (e.g., Philosophy); the workgroup homepage (e.g., CZ:Philosophy Workgroup; the article category page (e.g., Category:Philosophy Workgroup); the editor category page (e.g., CZ:Philosophy Editors; maybe an author category page (e.g., CZ:Philosophy authors).
- By the way, I much prefer "Category:Philosophy Workgroup" to "Category:Philosophy," because what we are categorizing are not articles, but which workgroup has responsibility for which articles. This is an important difference! We don't want all and only articles that happened to be categorized "Philosophy" articles by Wikipedia necessarily to be managed by our own Philosophy workgroup. For this we make our own decisions. --Larry Sanger 14:30, 19 November 2006 (CST)
Business
Should business be part of Applied Arts and Sciences ? It should be in the same category than Economics.. Anh