User talk:ElectionJune2015/Referenda/5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson (Created page with "Clarification needed. If the Council is inactive, as with these elections, would the ME have the same choice: arrange an election or appoint somebody? ~~~~") |
imported>John Stephenson (Managing Editor appointments disallowed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Clarification needed. If the Council is inactive, as with these elections, would the ME have the same choice: arrange an election or appoint somebody? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 08:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | Clarification needed. If the Council is inactive, as with these elections, would the ME have the same choice: arrange an election or appoint somebody? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 08:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:The ME can still appoint an Election Committee but it's worded to stop them from simply filling the Council with their own appointees. Anthony devised Article 50 of the Charter to specify what happens if governance seizes up completely. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] ([[User talk:John Stephenson|talk]]) 19:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:49, 9 June 2015
Clarification needed. If the Council is inactive, as with these elections, would the ME have the same choice: arrange an election or appoint somebody? Peter Jackson (talk) 08:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- The ME can still appoint an Election Committee but it's worded to stop them from simply filling the Council with their own appointees. Anthony devised Article 50 of the Charter to specify what happens if governance seizes up completely. John Stephenson (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)