User:Anthony.Sebastian/Motion suggestion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(New page: ==Motion to replace EC:2011-010== === Editors: roles and expectations === Editors shall be the referees responsible for monitoring, reviewing, and remeding Citizendium content.<br> In or...)
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
==Motion to replace EC:2011-010==
==Motion to replace EC:2011-010==


=== Editors: roles and expectations ===
=== Editors: roles and expectations ===


Editors shall be the referees responsible for monitoring, reviewing, and remeding Citizendium content.<br>
Editors shall be the referees responsible for monitoring, reviewing, correcting, and otherwise improving Citizendium content.<br>
In order to fulfill those roles, it is expected that Editors have the following general abilities:<br>
In order to fulfill those roles, it is expected that Editors have the following general abilities:<br>
* the ability to recognize good exposition, suitable for the intended audience,
* the ability to recognize good exposition, suitable for the intended audience,
Line 12: Line 13:
* the ability to determine if  
* the ability to determine if  
** an article is well-researched, and  
** an article is well-researched, and  
** its sources are rellevant and reliable.<br>
** its sources are relevant and reliable.
*the ability to know and respect the limits of their competence<br>
Remark:
Remark:
* This motion is not intended to establish criteria for appointment of Editors, or criteria for Editor nomination of articles for approval or for voting for approval.
* This motion is not intended to establish criteria for appointment of Editors, or criteria for Editor nomination of articles for approval or for voting for approval.


=== Text I'd like to replace, along with title change ===
==== Editor qualifications ====


 
Editors shall be the referees who monitor and review Citizendium content
 
and who are, by virtue of the following general qualifications
 
in combination with their specialized knowledge,
[[Category:CZ Live]]
entrusted with selecting articles for approval:
[[Category:Articles without metadata]]
* the ability to recognize good exposition, suitable for the intended audience,
[[Category:Stub Articles]]
* the abilitiy to evaluate articles with respect to
[[Category:Needs Workgroup]]
** their structure and organization and
** a consistent and balanced selection of their content,
* the ability to determine if
** an article is well-researched and
** to judge its sources with respect to their relevance and reliability.
Moreover, in order to be able to act responsibly,
Editors must know the limits of their competence
and be willing to respect them.

Latest revision as of 01:52, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Motion to replace EC:2011-010

Editors: roles and expectations

Editors shall be the referees responsible for monitoring, reviewing, correcting, and otherwise improving Citizendium content.
In order to fulfill those roles, it is expected that Editors have the following general abilities:

  • the ability to recognize good exposition, suitable for the intended audience,
  • the ability to evaluate articles with respect to
    • their structure and organization,
    • their clarity and coherence, and
    • their consistent and balanced content,
  • the ability to determine if
    • an article is well-researched, and
    • its sources are relevant and reliable.
  • the ability to know and respect the limits of their competence

Remark:

  • This motion is not intended to establish criteria for appointment of Editors, or criteria for Editor nomination of articles for approval or for voting for approval.

Text I'd like to replace, along with title change

Editor qualifications

Editors shall be the referees who monitor and review Citizendium content and who are, by virtue of the following general qualifications in combination with their specialized knowledge, entrusted with selecting articles for approval:

  • the ability to recognize good exposition, suitable for the intended audience,
  • the abilitiy to evaluate articles with respect to
    • their structure and organization and
    • a consistent and balanced selection of their content,
  • the ability to determine if
    • an article is well-researched and
    • to judge its sources with respect to their relevance and reliability.

Moreover, in order to be able to act responsibly, Editors must know the limits of their competence and be willing to respect them.