User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Background: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (Interwiki communication)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}


{{Image|PLoS-ad-putting-research-in-context.jpg|right|468px|Do journals provide sufficient contextualization for research?}}
 
{{Image|PLoS-ad-putting-research-in-context.jpg|right|468px|Do journals with stand-alone articles really provide sufficient contextualization for research?}}
 


== Putting research in context ==
== Putting research in context ==
Line 8: Line 11:
*Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, and the remaining hurdles are cultural ones.
*Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, and the remaining hurdles are cultural ones.


*Wikis allow for systematic linking and thus enhanced contextualization (sidenote: some have argued that [http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/links_in_text.php links are distracting])
*Wikis allow for systematic linking and thus enhanced contextualization (sidenote: some have argued that [http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/links_in_text.php links are distracting]; this can be solved via user preferences)


*[http://thisiscolab.com/blog/dear-scientists-stop-duplicating-work/ Dear Scientists, Stop Duplicating Work]
*[http://thisiscolab.com/blog/dear-scientists-stop-duplicating-work/ Dear Scientists, Stop Duplicating Work]
== Interwiki communication ==
<center><blockquote>'''''if you assert something said in another paper, sod the citation, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Transclusion transclude] the relevant text, with a full electronic citation allowing you to verify it.'''<br />&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[http://ptsefton.com/2010/08/07/the-next-wave-in-scholarly-word-processors.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3086 Christopher Gutteridge<!-- 1st comment on Sefton's post at http://ptsefton.com/2010/08/07/the-next-wave-in-scholarly-word-processors.htm -->]</blockquote>
</center>
*[http://wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/New_Pages_and_Links/Interwiki_links Interwiki links]
*[http://test.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Widget_tests#Widget:SlideShare MediaWiki Extensions, e.g. for Widgets]

Latest revision as of 03:41, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.



The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Session start · Talk start · Quotes · Background · Wikis as science communication platforms ·
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo


(CC) Image: Public Library of Science
Do journals with stand-alone articles really provide sufficient contextualization for research?


Putting research in context

  • For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per iteration of the research cycle
  • Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, and the remaining hurdles are cultural ones.
  • Wikis allow for systematic linking and thus enhanced contextualization (sidenote: some have argued that links are distracting; this can be solved via user preferences)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/COASP_2010/Background&oldid=905178"