User talk:Stefan Olejniczak: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok m (→The Knowledge article needs to be looked at: new section) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:Nomination page" to "Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editor Policy|Editor Policy]]</small> | |align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editor Policy|Editor Policy]]</small> | ||
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editorial Council|Editorial Council]]</small> | |align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editorial Council|Editorial Council]]</small> | ||
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ: | |align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Moderator Group|Constabulary]]</small> | ||
|} | |} | ||
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|<small>[[Welcome Page]]</small> | |width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|<small>[[Welcome Page]]</small> | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==You've been Nominated!== | ==You've been Nominated!== | ||
Someone has nominated you for a position in the new Citizendium. They have noticed you're dedication to the project and like what they see. To be listed on the ballot for the position, it is necessary that you accept the nomination on the [[ | Someone has nominated you for a position in the new Citizendium. They have noticed you're dedication to the project and like what they see. To be listed on the ballot for the position, it is necessary that you accept the nomination on the [[Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council|Nomination page]. Just place accept next to your name along with the four tildes. The nomination period will close at midnight October 7 (UTC). Article 54 of the new charter details the requirements: | ||
===Article 54=== | ===Article 54=== | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Since the article is classified as in the Philosophy workgroup .... and there are no active Philosophy editors ... I am asking Philosophy authors like you to take a good look at Dmitrii's additional material and to revise it as appropriate. If nothing else, some of the formatting leaves much to be desired. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | Since the article is classified as in the Philosophy workgroup .... and there are no active Philosophy editors ... I am asking Philosophy authors like you to take a good look at Dmitrii's additional material and to revise it as appropriate. If nothing else, some of the formatting leaves much to be desired. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Hello Milton, I did some minor language corrections in the article which indeed has not been written in very good English. However, I do not think I am able to judge all the sources he used on their value. So you should ask someone else to do that, I'm afraid. [[User:Stefan Olejniczak|Stefan Olejniczak]] 23:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:52, 8 March 2024
Welcome!
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! D. Matt Innis 12:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome also from me, Stefan — nice to see you jumping right in. It seems you can find your way here by yourself but in case of problems, feel free to ask anyone you see on Recent Changes. --Daniel Mietchen 18:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Daniel, thanks for welcoming me!! I already feel at home here, the atmosphere is good. Stefan Olejniczak 18:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Dear Stefan Olejniczak, thank you for your corrections in "Lifecycle (religion)". My English is really bad, makes me feel quite desperate. Ed Jussen 21:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Dear Ed Jussen, you're welcome! Never mind, I like to do it :) Stefan Olejniczak 21:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, of course I try to take advantage of your kindness, because I'm writing a much larger article at the moment. Is it okay that I warn you when it is finished? Regards, Ed Jussen 08:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Of course that's OK Ed, I'm glad if I can help. Stefan Olejniczak 08:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, of course I try to take advantage of your kindness, because I'm writing a much larger article at the moment. Is it okay that I warn you when it is finished? Regards, Ed Jussen 08:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
You've been Nominated!
Someone has nominated you for a position in the new Citizendium. They have noticed you're dedication to the project and like what they see. To be listed on the ballot for the position, it is necessary that you accept the nomination on the [[Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council|Nomination page]. Just place accept next to your name along with the four tildes. The nomination period will close at midnight October 7 (UTC). Article 54 of the new charter details the requirements:
Article 54
- In conjunction with the Declaration of the Editor-in-Chief regarding the effectivity of this Charter, there shall be a call for nominations for the following offices: Managament Council (five seats), Editorial Council (seven seats), Managing Editor (one), Ombudsman (one). This shall be the effective date of the Charter.
- Any Citizen may nominate candidates for these positions.
- Nominations shall be collected and collated by the Chief Constable.
- Nominations shall be accepted no more than fourteen days after the effective date of the charter; the ballot shall be available starting on the twentieth day after the effective date of the charter; the election shall be completed no more than twenty-eight days after the effective date of the charter; all elected officials shall begin their term of office on the thirtieth day after the effective date of the charter.
- Only candidates who accept their nomination shall be eligible to appear on the ballot. Nominated candidates can accept nominations for no more than two official functions. Accepting a nomination serves as a declaration of commitment, in the case of being elected, to fulfill this function until the limit of the term.
- All positions shall be elected by a simple majority of the voting citizenry. In the case of a tie, an immediate run-off election shall be held.
- In the event that a candidate has been elected for two functions, the candidate shall declare which one he or she accepts within three days of announcement of the election results. In the event that such a declaration has not been made during this period, the candidate shall be considered elected for the position for which the nomination was accepted first. The same procedure applies to a reserve member that becomes elected by a seat being vacated this way.
If you would like to make a statement to help voters, click the "Statement" link to the right of your name.
Thanks again for the commitment you're making to assure that Citizendium becomes the premier quality online source we all have envisioned.
D. Matt Innis 13:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Matt, thank you for telling! I've accepted. Stefan Olejniczak 13:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Consonant names
Hello, Stefan. Thanks for your additions to the English irregular noun catalogue. It occurred to me that the consonant names could go in English phonemes as well. But I never used them much & my terminology may well be out of date. I've put in the first one, if you'd like to have a look. Thanks! Ro Thorpe 23:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
The Knowledge article needs to be looked at
On our Welcome page, visitors are pointed to the Knowledge article. With that in mind, it is critical that the article be well written and impress them.
Recently, Dmitrii Kouznetsov added a major amount of material to the article which increased the article length fifteen-fold (from 1,565 bytes to 23, 990 bytes). Unfortunately, Dmitrii's command of the English language is not too good. Also, although I am not philosopher, it seems to me that some of his additional material may not be too relevant. I also wonder if some of his references are valid or appropriate.
Since the article is classified as in the Philosophy workgroup .... and there are no active Philosophy editors ... I am asking Philosophy authors like you to take a good look at Dmitrii's additional material and to revise it as appropriate. If nothing else, some of the formatting leaves much to be desired. Milton Beychok 22:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Milton, I did some minor language corrections in the article which indeed has not been written in very good English. However, I do not think I am able to judge all the sources he used on their value. So you should ask someone else to do that, I'm afraid. Stefan Olejniczak 23:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)