Template:CharterVote2/11/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (New page: <noinclude>< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE<br /></noinclude> *The Citizendium shall welcome contributions to all fields of knowledge. Per Jo...) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (agree) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Agree [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
**I remain concerned that this is an open invitation to fringe and advocacy material. Suggest: | |||
"The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge, subject to Editorial Council review for objectivity and reliability." There's probably a better word than "reliability". | |||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Advocacy is covered by Article 16. Subjects from the fringe should be allowed if they are presented "comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively" as per Article 12. Agree to "The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge." from Matt above. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 01:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::I can live with this, although I don't like it. This does remind me, however, that Article 12 should use something other than "neutrally" so we don't fall again into the trap of the neutrality policy. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 02:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Agree to "The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge." from Matt above. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 00:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 17 July 2010
- The Citizendium shall welcome contributions to all fields of knowledge.
Per Joe's suggestion; change 'to' to 'in':
- The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge.
D. Matt Innis 19:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree Russell D. Jones 21:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- I remain concerned that this is an open invitation to fringe and advocacy material. Suggest:
"The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge, subject to Editorial Council review for objectivity and reliability." There's probably a better word than "reliability".
Howard C. Berkowitz 22:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Advocacy is covered by Article 16. Subjects from the fringe should be allowed if they are presented "comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively" as per Article 12. Agree to "The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge." from Matt above. --Joe Quick 01:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- I can live with this, although I don't like it. This does remind me, however, that Article 12 should use something other than "neutrally" so we don't fall again into the trap of the neutrality policy. Howard C. Berkowitz 02:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree to "The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge." from Matt above. --Daniel Mietchen 00:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)