Complement (set theory): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (New entry, just a stub) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
In [[set theory]], the '''complement''' of a [[subset]] of a given [[set (mathematics)|set]] is the "remainder" of the larger set. | In [[set theory]], the '''complement''' of a [[subset]] of a given [[set (mathematics)|set]] is the "remainder" of the larger set. | ||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
:<math>\overline{A \cap B} = \bar A \cup \bar B ; \,</math> | :<math>\overline{A \cap B} = \bar A \cup \bar B ; \,</math> | ||
:<math>\overline{A \cup B} = \bar A \cap \bar B . \,</math> | :<math>\overline{A \cup B} = \bar A \cap \bar B . \,</math>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 31 July 2024
In set theory, the complement of a subset of a given set is the "remainder" of the larger set.
Formally, if A is a subset of X then the (relative) complement of A in X is
In some version of set theory it is common to postulate a "universal set" and restrict attention only to sets which are contained in this universe. We may then define the (absolute) complement
The relation of complementation to the other set-theoretic functions is given by De Morgan's laws: