Talk:History of music psychology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ulrich Terstiege No edit summary |
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (Talk:History of music psychology research moved to Talk:History of music psychology: removing redundancy) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Structure of the talk== | |||
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts. | My plan is to divide the talk into two parts. | ||
Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper | Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper by Leman and Schneider, and it includes a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. If time permits, I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention | ||
# the work of von Helmholtz, | # the work of von Helmholtz, | ||
# Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion, | # Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion, | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Does anybody know? | Does anybody know? | ||
[[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] | [[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] 3 August 2008 | ||
:I would extend part I as you suggest, and shorten part II accordingly. Sachs is still widely cited as a fundamental contributor to the field of comparative musicology but he can't be considered as being prominent in current mainstream research. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 04:40, 4 September 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:05, 25 December 2008
Structure of the talk
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.
Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper by Leman and Schneider, and it includes a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. If time permits, I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention
- the work of von Helmholtz,
- Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion,
- the cognitive model of perception of music given by Knoblauch in 1888.
Part II discusses the content of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know?
Ulrich Terstiege 3 August 2008
- I would extend part I as you suggest, and shorten part II accordingly. Sachs is still widely cited as a fundamental contributor to the field of comparative musicology but he can't be considered as being prominent in current mainstream research. Daniel Mietchen 04:40, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Music Category Check
- Psychology Category Check
- History Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Music Developing Articles
- Music Nonstub Articles
- Music Internal Articles
- Psychology Developing Articles
- Psychology Nonstub Articles
- Psychology Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Music Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Psychology Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag