Talk:Intelligence on the Korean War: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Richard Jensen (Rose wrong) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==FRUS== | |||
Some new FRUS [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/truman/c24687.htm Foreign Relations, 1950-1955 The Intelligence Community (2007)] [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 11:28, 14 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
==Rose== | |||
Re Rose. I think his evidence proves that CIA was exactly correrct and timely regarding the capabilities of the North Koreans and Chinese. That was their mission and they got it right. And indeed NK was controlled by Moscow. What they got "wrong" was the assumption that North Korea and China would not do something massively stupid, such as fighting the USA. It destroyed the North and set back China for years (Mao was prone to national suicide, as the Great leap Forward, the break with Moscow, hisa risk of nuclear war with BOTH Russia and US, and the Cultural Revolution, all after 1950, show). [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 15:03, 14 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 14 May 2008
FRUS
Some new FRUS Foreign Relations, 1950-1955 The Intelligence Community (2007) Richard Jensen 11:28, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
Rose
Re Rose. I think his evidence proves that CIA was exactly correrct and timely regarding the capabilities of the North Koreans and Chinese. That was their mission and they got it right. And indeed NK was controlled by Moscow. What they got "wrong" was the assumption that North Korea and China would not do something massively stupid, such as fighting the USA. It destroyed the North and set back China for years (Mao was prone to national suicide, as the Great leap Forward, the break with Moscow, hisa risk of nuclear war with BOTH Russia and US, and the Cultural Revolution, all after 1950, show). Richard Jensen 15:03, 14 May 2008 (CDT)