Talk:Septic shock: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk m (subpages) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Citations that references are available: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{WPauthor2|badgettrg|Septic shock|I wrote most (possible all) of the content that I copy/pasted from WP|[[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 14:07, 22 January 2008 (CST)}} | {{WPauthor2|badgettrg|Septic shock|I wrote most (possible all) of the content that I copy/pasted from WP|[[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 14:07, 22 January 2008 (CST)}} | ||
== Citations that references are available == | |||
The recommendation on antibiotic selection either is dead or requires registration. I tend to think simply saying "recommendations are available" and not, at least, summarizing them, doesn't add to the article. We need to walk a delicate line between being essentially a bibliography, and contextualizing references. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 15:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 4 May 2010
New article
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| I released this article to the Wikipedia article Septic shock, under the Wikipedia username badgettrg. | |
| I wrote most (possible all) of the content that I copy/pasted from WP | |
| Robert Badgett 14:07, 22 January 2008 (CST) |
Citations that references are available
The recommendation on antibiotic selection either is dead or requires registration. I tend to think simply saying "recommendations are available" and not, at least, summarizing them, doesn't add to the article. We need to walk a delicate line between being essentially a bibliography, and contextualizing references. Howard C. Berkowitz 15:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)