Talk:Edward I/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:New Article of the Week" to "Archive:New Draft of the Week") |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
==Nominated for New Article of the Week== | ==Nominated for New Article of the Week== | ||
I have nominated this article to be the [[ | I have nominated this article to be the [[Archive:New Draft of the Week|New Article of the Week]]! -- [[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 09:58, 8 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Congratulations, [[Edward I]]! You're the first New Article of the Week! -- [[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 13:09, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
==Article Review== | ==Article Review== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
Can anyone fix the bit of text that got stuck behind the main picture? [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 05:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | Can anyone fix the bit of text that got stuck behind the main picture? [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 05:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Thanks, the whole article looks a good deal better now. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 06:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
==Image of the Black Prince== | |||
I have removed the image associated with Llewelyn the Last, as it is—in fact—not him... Rather, this is the well-known effigy of the Black Prince from Canterbury Cathedral! I'm surprised this article got to New Article of the Week with such a basic error. [[User:Paul James Cowie|Paul James Cowie]] 09:29, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Whoops! I seen it listed as that on a reliable enough website - didn't even look at it properly enough to be honest. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:33, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
PS- Basic errors tend to be more common and persistent than complex ones by the way! [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:34, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
==ToApprove== | |||
I just removed the ToApprove tag that was placed on this talk page. Instead it is now on the metadata page. See [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Template:Edward_I/Metadata&diff=100152454&oldid=100152453 my edit here]. This places the [[Edward I/Approval|approval page]] in the ToApprove category as well as a ToApprove tempalte on all the clusters pages. The constable that finalises this approval just has to blank the ToApprove fields in the metadata page and place the approving editors name in the Approved field (that will change all the categories and place the too approve temaplte automatically. However, moving this talk page to the Draft talk still has to be done manually. As does the protection of the approved article and the creation of the draft page. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] | |||
== Article approved == | |||
Article approved (version 1.0), 19th August 2007. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 04:47, 19 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Edward_I&oldid=100152508 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div> | |||
Latest revision as of 04:02, 8 March 2024
Nominated for New Article of the Week
I have nominated this article to be the New Article of the Week! -- Carl Jantzen 09:58, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
Congratulations, Edward I! You're the first New Article of the Week! -- Carl Jantzen 13:09, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Article Review
This article needs a little more work, specifically in the rule of law section and the Scottish section. I will try and wrap it up in the next few days. Denis Cavanagh 03:52, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
I deem this article to be practically finished. Some of it was directly copied and pasted from some of the websites provided, but I feel I edited it succintly. Denis Cavanagh 07:27, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
- Denis, you might as a next step find an editor to look things over. Just browse the history workgroup category. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 14:37, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
How exactly do you get someone to look it over, I don't want to bug anyone Denis Cavanagh 03:27, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
The Main picture
Can anyone fix the bit of text that got stuck behind the main picture? Denis Cavanagh 05:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT) Thanks, the whole article looks a good deal better now. Denis Cavanagh 06:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Image of the Black Prince
I have removed the image associated with Llewelyn the Last, as it is—in fact—not him... Rather, this is the well-known effigy of the Black Prince from Canterbury Cathedral! I'm surprised this article got to New Article of the Week with such a basic error. Paul James Cowie 09:29, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
Whoops! I seen it listed as that on a reliable enough website - didn't even look at it properly enough to be honest. Denis Cavanagh 09:33, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
PS- Basic errors tend to be more common and persistent than complex ones by the way! Denis Cavanagh 09:34, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
ToApprove
I just removed the ToApprove tag that was placed on this talk page. Instead it is now on the metadata page. See my edit here. This places the approval page in the ToApprove category as well as a ToApprove tempalte on all the clusters pages. The constable that finalises this approval just has to blank the ToApprove fields in the metadata page and place the approving editors name in the Approved field (that will change all the categories and place the too approve temaplte automatically. However, moving this talk page to the Draft talk still has to be done manually. As does the protection of the approved article and the creation of the draft page. Chris Day (talk)
Article approved
Article approved (version 1.0), 19th August 2007. Anton Sweeney 04:47, 19 August 2007 (CDT)