Talk:René Descartes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kevin M I Schutte No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (removed delete question -- the article is being worked on from time to time) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
This is just an uploaded Wikipedia article; Simon, has it been changed? | This is just an uploaded Wikipedia article; Simon, has it been changed? | ||
Line 17: | Line 6: | ||
:A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they ''are'' improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | :A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they ''are'' improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Interestingly, I just saw some additions in wikipedia that mirror the changes I put into this article. Possible better written, since I am not a writer. Is it possible that we being copied by wikipedia now? [[User:Daniel Demaret|Daniel Demaret]] 02:53, 13 May 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 14:12, 22 January 2009
This is just an uploaded Wikipedia article; Simon, has it been changed?
As someone who studied and taught Descartes quite a bit, I can tell you that we can do far better than this. --Larry Sanger 11:53, 26 February 2007 (CST)
- A few substantive changes appear to have been made from the Wikipedia version, and from what I can tell they are improvements (including the removal of quite a few pointless editorial comments). I suppose this only indicates how unsatisfactory Wikipedia articles can be. Hopefully, we can make it worth reading. - Kevin M I Schutte 21:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Interestingly, I just saw some additions in wikipedia that mirror the changes I put into this article. Possible better written, since I am not a writer. Is it possible that we being copied by wikipedia now? Daniel Demaret 02:53, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- History Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- History tag