Land: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Janos Abel
m (typo)
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In economic theory, '''land''' is one of the three [[factors of production]]. The other factors are [[labour]] and [[capital]].
{{subpages}}


Alongside [[labour]] land is also recognised by most (? Samuelson uses the phrase ''often called'', pp. 50) economists as a primary factor.<ref>Samuelson and Nordhaus ''Economics'', (1989).</ref>
In the categorisation adopted for didactic purposes by the classical economists,  '''land''' is one of three [[factors of production]], the others being [[labour]] and [[capital (economics)]]. It is distinguished from the other two factors by the fact that it exists independently of economic activity, and the fact that its supply  is fixed and thus  independent of economic activity. The meaning of the term so defined is broader than its meaning in common usage because it includes natural energy sources such as solar energy, tidal energy and wind.


However, the Chicago School of economic thought seems to have been founded (and funded by J. D. Rockefeller) to eliminate the notion of ''land'' altogether from economics not just make it rank equal with capital and labour.<ref>Mason Gaffney in ''The Corruption Of Economics (1994) pp. 117-112.</ref>
A corollary of fact that its supply  is independent of economic activity is the fact that a tax on its value has no effect upon economic activity. As [[Paul Samuelson]] puts it  "A tax on rent will lead to no distortions or economic inefficiencies". <ref>Samuelson and Nordhaus, ''Economics'' (1989) pp. 668</ref>


Closely coupled with land is the notion of rent -- [[economic rent]], to be exact. With this goes the thorny question of "who is entitled to collect the value that accrues to land in its undeveloped state?"


Most classical economists from Adam Smith to J.S. Mill were explicit on this issue. In the words of Adam Smith, “Both ground-rents and the ordinary rent of land are a species of revenue which the owner, in many cases, enjoys without any care or attention of his own… (and) are, therefore, perhaps, the species of revenue which can best bear to have a peculiar tax imposed upon them.” <ref>’’The wealth of nations (1776), Book II, Ch.2, Art.1</ref>
<references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
 
This principle of "least bad tax" is still acknowledged by most economists today. Paul Samuelson assures us that "A tax on rent will lead to no distortions or economic inefficiencies". <ref>Samuelson and Nordhaus, ''Economics'' (1989) pp. 668</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<references/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Economics Workgroup]]
[[Category:Geography Workgroup]]
[[Category: CZ Live]]

Latest revision as of 16:01, 9 September 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Land&printable=yes
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In the categorisation adopted for didactic purposes by the classical economists, land is one of three factors of production, the others being labour and capital (economics). It is distinguished from the other two factors by the fact that it exists independently of economic activity, and the fact that its supply is fixed and thus independent of economic activity. The meaning of the term so defined is broader than its meaning in common usage because it includes natural energy sources such as solar energy, tidal energy and wind.

A corollary of fact that its supply is independent of economic activity is the fact that a tax on its value has no effect upon economic activity. As Paul Samuelson puts it "A tax on rent will lead to no distortions or economic inefficiencies". [1]


  1. ↑ Samuelson and Nordhaus, Economics (1989) pp. 668
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Land&oldid=978370"