Talk:Endosymbiotic theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
Article seems to discuss only the mitochondrion, and there is quite a lot of work on the proto- plastids that should be added--perhaps it is elsewhere in WP?19:55, 18 November 2006 (CST) | Article seems to discuss only the mitochondrion, and there is quite a lot of work on the proto- plastids that should be added--perhaps it is elsewhere in WP?19:55, 18 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
*[[Proto-mitochondrion]] | *[[Proto-mitochondrion]] | ||
Clearly there should be a lot more on the chloroplasts, especially the secondary and tertiary events since their existence indicates that endosymbiosis is not a rare event. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 16:25, 19 November 2006 (CST) | Clearly there should be a lot more on the chloroplasts, especially the secondary and tertiary events since their existence indicates that endosymbiosis is not a rare event. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 16:25, 19 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 26 September 2007
Article seems to discuss only the mitochondrion, and there is quite a lot of work on the proto- plastids that should be added--perhaps it is elsewhere in WP?19:55, 18 November 2006 (CST)
A quick search turned up the following articles that are related to some degree.
- Transfer_of_mitochondrial_and_chloroplast_DNA_to_the_nucleus
- Symbiogenesis
- Endosymbiont
- Nucleomorph
- Chlorarachniophyte
- Cryptomonad
- Proto-mitochondrion
Clearly there should be a lot more on the chloroplasts, especially the secondary and tertiary events since their existence indicates that endosymbiosis is not a rare event. Chris Day (Talk) 16:25, 19 November 2006 (CST)