CZ Talk:Election July-August 2013/Referenda/4: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (Previous open registration system) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (→Previous open registration system: no support here) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Previous open registration system== | ==Previous open registration system== | ||
Many years ago, in the project's infancy, we actually had something like this: for a brief period, anyone could register an account and immediately get started. I say "brief" because within a short space of time, the wiki was [http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=129 bombarded with vandalism], including a lengthy series of very nasty edits directed at individual project members. The experiment was [http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=134 shut down] and we've required verified real names ever since. Because of that experience, I think I could only support this if we had flagged revisions on every page, checked by reviewers whose identities had been verified. ('Flagged revisions' is a setting where an edit is held in a queue, invisible to general readers, until someone else comes along and approves it.) That requires some technical set-up that would probably not materialise. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 15:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | Many years ago, in the project's infancy, we actually had something like this: for a brief period, anyone could register an account and immediately get started. I say "brief" because within a short space of time, the wiki was [http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=129 bombarded with vandalism], including a lengthy series of very nasty edits directed at individual project members. The experiment was [http://blog.citizendium.org/?p=134 shut down] and we've required verified real names ever since. Because of that experience, I think I could only support this if we had flagged revisions on every page, checked by reviewers whose identities had been verified. ('Flagged revisions' is a setting where an edit is held in a queue, invisible to general readers, until someone else comes along and approves it.) That requires some technical set-up that would probably not materialise. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 15:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Bad idea== | |||
I also don't think this referendum is the best solution and invites, as per John's reminiscences of CZ's past, vandalism. If the problem is that there is no one to approve the creation of new accounts, then this power should be vested in the Managing Editor or the (soon-to-be) CZ Council. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 16 July 2013
Previous open registration system
Many years ago, in the project's infancy, we actually had something like this: for a brief period, anyone could register an account and immediately get started. I say "brief" because within a short space of time, the wiki was bombarded with vandalism, including a lengthy series of very nasty edits directed at individual project members. The experiment was shut down and we've required verified real names ever since. Because of that experience, I think I could only support this if we had flagged revisions on every page, checked by reviewers whose identities had been verified. ('Flagged revisions' is a setting where an edit is held in a queue, invisible to general readers, until someone else comes along and approves it.) That requires some technical set-up that would probably not materialise. John Stephenson 15:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Bad idea
I also don't think this referendum is the best solution and invites, as per John's reminiscences of CZ's past, vandalism. If the problem is that there is no one to approve the creation of new accounts, then this power should be vested in the Managing Editor or the (soon-to-be) CZ Council. Russell D. Jones 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)