User talk:Darshak Mishra/Removal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Removal {{Removal|call}}: Case 2012-001) |
imported>David Finn |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
No reaction by its author. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | No reaction by its author. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:No reaction in four days? We shouldn't need reminding that getting a reaction is not always a quick process at Citizendium. Four days is far short of excessive. In any event a better way to get a reaction from a new user might be to contact them via their talkpage, especially since you were waiting for their response. I will do that for you now. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 18:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Historic site? == | == Historic site? == | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 31 January 2012
The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.
Removal
Removal suggested by Peter Schmitt 10:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Editorial Council: Case 2012-001
- Opened: Peter Schmitt 10:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Closed:
Comments
No reaction by its author. --Peter Schmitt 10:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- No reaction in four days? We shouldn't need reminding that getting a reaction is not always a quick process at Citizendium. Four days is far short of excessive. In any event a better way to get a reaction from a new user might be to contact them via their talkpage, especially since you were waiting for their response. I will do that for you now. David Finn 18:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Historic site?
As it reads now, this is not an encyclopedic article but an advertisement for a hotel.
If the hotel is in a transformed historical building then the building and its history should be the topic. If it was newly built in 1956 then the article should show why it is interesting or significant.
(In its current form it will have to be removed.)
--Peter Schmitt 14:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)