Template:CharterVote2/40/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (Suggestion) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (clarification) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude> | <noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude> | ||
I'm not so conversant with the workings of the Mediawiki software to know this, but is it possible to completely remove parts of articles from the database such that they are not even accessible by the history? Given that we are operating under our real names, we should have the right to have dispute resolutions resolved privately and the record expunged, no? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 14:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | I'm not so conversant with the workings of the Mediawiki software to know this, but is it possible to completely remove parts of articles from the database such that they are not even accessible by the history? The Ombudsman could re-write a page and then delete the original (but the original still remains and can be recovered). Given that we are operating under our real names, we should have the right to have dispute resolutions resolved privately and the record expunged, no? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 14:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Normally, dispute resolutions should be heard in public. However, | Normally, dispute resolutions should be heard in public. However, | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 17 July 2010
< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE
I'm not so conversant with the workings of the Mediawiki software to know this, but is it possible to completely remove parts of articles from the database such that they are not even accessible by the history? The Ombudsman could re-write a page and then delete the original (but the original still remains and can be recovered). Given that we are operating under our real names, we should have the right to have dispute resolutions resolved privately and the record expunged, no? Russell D. Jones 14:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Normally, dispute resolutions should be heard in public. However,
- Participants may request that disputes be heard privately.
- Privately heard disputes forfeit their right to appeal on technical grounds.
- in some cases, either at the discretion of the appellant council or at the request of a grievant part of a public dispute resolution process may be
restricted to a smaller audiencepermanently removed from the Citizendium. Such an exception shall require public justification by the Ombudsman.