CZ Talk:History Workgroup/Style Guide

Probably should move some of the discussion here

Come the revolution, or whatever, and there's an active Editorial Council, we can look for general solutions. I don't disagree, Russell, that you've defined a use for Debate Guide, but, if you hadn't explained it, I wouldn't have thought of that application. Instead, I would have assumed it was a guide for educators assigning debates, which may or may not be a likely CZ audience given the Charter draft assumptions about audience. With Larry's K-12 interests, I suspect some of the subpages are meant to serve that audience.

If you'll look at Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain/Bibliography, do you think the the Radcliffe entry should belongs there. The way you've described "works" comes closest, except this is a pointer to an collection of manuscripts from the family. I still think we are being too nuanced among bibliography, external links, works, etc. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

My advice is that it's probably a good idea to note where his papers can be found, so keep it. I've added a line about archives to the style guide. Russell D. Jones