File talk:Conic section.png: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov (axis, code) |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It seems to me that the vertical line (that represents the axis of the conic surface) should be visible until the centers of the ellipses created by the intersections with the planes, I mean the case of red ellipse and the green ellipse; in the similar way as you did it for the uper and lower white circles. | It seems to me that the vertical line (that represents the axis of the conic surface) should be visible until the centers of the ellipses created by the intersections with the planes, I mean the case of red ellipse and the green ellipse; in the similar way as you did it for the uper and lower white circles. | ||
(In addition, you may consider to draw a square evolving the ellipse in each case, in order to represent better the planes.) [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 18:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | (In addition, you may consider to draw a square evolving the ellipse in each case, in order to represent better the planes.) [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 18:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Dmitri, I made a new effort, but I'm not quite happy with it. Can you do better?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:55, 3 May 2010
axis, code
Paul, will you consider to provide the code that draws the figure and/or to correct it by yourself. It seems to me that the vertical line (that represents the axis of the conic surface) should be visible until the centers of the ellipses created by the intersections with the planes, I mean the case of red ellipse and the green ellipse; in the similar way as you did it for the uper and lower white circles. (In addition, you may consider to draw a square evolving the ellipse in each case, in order to represent better the planes.) Dmitrii Kouznetsov 18:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Dmitri, I made a new effort, but I'm not quite happy with it. Can you do better?--Paul Wormer 10:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
