Phonetics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(category no longer needed)
imported>John Stephenson
(Acoustic image)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Phonetics'''<ref>From the [[Greek language|Greek]] word &phi;&omega;&nu;ή, ''phone'' = sound/voice.</ref> is the study of [[sound]]s and the [[human voice]]. It is concerned with the actual properties of speech sounds ([[phones]]) as well as those of non-speech sounds, and their production, audition  and perception, as opposed to [[phonology]], which is the study of abstract units (such as [[phoneme]]s and [[distinctive feature]]s) which underlie both [[speech]] and [[writing]]. Phonetics deals with the sounds themselves rather than the contexts in which they are used in languages. Discussions of meaning ([[semantics]]) do not enter at this level of [[linguistics|linguistic analysis]], therefore.
'''Phonetics'''<ref>From the [[Greek language|Greek]] word &phi;&omega;&nu;ή, ''phone'' = sound/voice.</ref> is the study of [[sound]]s and the [[human voice]]. It is concerned with the actual properties of speech sounds ([[phones]]) as well as those of non-speech sounds, and their production, audition  and perception, as opposed to [[phonology]], which is the study of abstract units (such as [[phoneme]]s and [[distinctive feature]]s) which underlie both [[speech]] and [[writing]]. Phonetics deals with the sounds themselves rather than the contexts in which they are used in languages. Discussions of meaning ([[semantics]]) do not enter at this level of [[linguistics|linguistic analysis]], therefore.


While [[writing system]]s and [[alphabet]]s often attempt to represent the sounds of speech, phoneticians are more concerned with the sounds themselves than the [[symbol]]s used to represent them. So close is the relationship between them, however, that many dictionaries list the study of the symbols (more accurately [[semiotics]]) as a part of phonetic studies {{fact}}. [[Logographic]] writing systems typically give much less phonetic information, although it is not necessarily non-existent.  For instance, in [[Chinese character]]s, a ''phonetic'' is a portion of the character that hints at its pronunciation, while the [[radical (Chinese character)|radical]] gives [[semantics|semantic]] information.  Characters featuring the same phonetic typically have similar pronunciations, but by no means are the pronunciations predictably determined by the phonetic; this is because pronunciations diverged over many centuries while the characters remained the same. Not all Chinese characters are ''radical-phonetic compounds'', but a good majority of them are.
While [[writing system]]s and [[alphabet]]s often attempt to represent the sounds of speech, phoneticians are more concerned with the sounds themselves than the [[symbol]]s used to represent them. So close is the relationship between them, however, that many dictionaries list the study of the symbols (more accurately [[semiotics]]) as a part of phonetic studies. [[Logographic]] writing systems typically give much less phonetic information, although it is not necessarily non-existent.  For instance, in [[Chinese character]]s, a ''phonetic'' is a portion of the character that hints at its pronunciation, while the [[radical (Chinese character)|radical]] gives [[semantics|semantic]] information.  Characters featuring the same phonetic typically have similar pronunciations, but by no means are the pronunciations predictably determined by the phonetic; this is because pronunciations diverged over many centuries while the characters remained the same. Not all Chinese characters are ''radical-phonetic compounds'', but a good majority of them are.


Phonetics has three main branches:
Phonetics has three main branches:
Line 12: Line 12:


Phonetics was studied as early as 2500 years ago in [[Indian subcontinent|ancient India]], with {{Unicode|[[Pāṇini]]'s}} account of the place and manner of articulation of consonants in his [[5th century BC|5th century BCE]] treatise on [[Sanskrit]]. The major [[Brahmic family|Indic alphabets]] today, except [[Tamil script]], order their consonants according to {{Unicode|Pāṇini's}} classification.
Phonetics was studied as early as 2500 years ago in [[Indian subcontinent|ancient India]], with {{Unicode|[[Pāṇini]]'s}} account of the place and manner of articulation of consonants in his [[5th century BC|5th century BCE]] treatise on [[Sanskrit]]. The major [[Brahmic family|Indic alphabets]] today, except [[Tamil script]], order their consonants according to {{Unicode|Pāṇini's}} classification.
[[Image:Vowels-spectrogram-british-english-adult-male.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Phonetics often involves modern [[technology]] to analyse [[speech]]. This [[spectrogram]] as used in [[acoustic phonetics]] shows the [[frequency|frequencies]] of vibrations involved in the production of six [[British English]] [[vowel]]s  by an [[adult]] [[male]] [[native speaker]]: from left to right, the vowels as in ''bee'', ''sue'', ''herd'', ''or'', ''bar'' and ''buy''. The bands of energy ([[formant]]s) are distinctive for each vowel; for example, the lower the bottom formant ('F1'), the higher the vowel is articulated in the [[mouth]]. This image was created using the [http://www.praat.org Praat] freeware program.]]


==See also==  
==See also==  
Line 30: Line 31:


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
 
*Catford, J. C. (1977). ''Fundamental problems in phonetics''. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32520-X.
* Catford, J. C. (1977). ''Fundamental problems in phonetics''. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32520-X.
*Clark, John; & Yallop, Colin. (1995). ''An introduction to phonetics and phonology'' (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19452-5.
* Clark, John; & Yallop, Colin. (1995). ''An introduction to phonetics and phonology'' (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19452-5.
*Hardcastle, William J.; & Laver, John (Eds.). (1997). ''The handbook of phonetic sciences''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-6311-8848-7.
* Hardcastle, William J.; & Laver, John (Eds.). (1997). ''The handbook of phonetic sciences''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-6311-8848-7.
*[[Peter Ladefoged|Ladefoged, Peter]]. (1982). ''A course in phonetics'' (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
* [[Peter Ladefoged|Ladefoged, Peter]]. (1982). ''A course in phonetics'' (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
*Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). ''Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques''. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-23269-9 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-23270-2 (pbk).
* Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). ''Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques''. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-23269-9 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-23270-2 (pbk).
*Ladefoged, Peter; & Maddieson, Ian. (1996).  ''The sounds of the world's languages''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-631-19814-8 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-19815-6 (pbk).
*Ladefoged, Peter; & Maddieson, Ian. (1996).  ''The sounds of the world's languages''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-631-19814-8 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-19815-6 (pbk).
* [[Ian Maddieson|Maddieson, Ian]]. (1984). ''Patterns of sounds''. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*[[Ian Maddieson|Maddieson, Ian]]. (1984). ''Patterns of sounds''. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). ''Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds''. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
*Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). ''Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds''. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
* Pisoni, David B.; & Remez, Robert E. (Eds.). (2004). ''The handbook of speech perception''. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-6312-2927-2.
*Pisoni, David B.; & Remez, Robert E. (Eds.). (2004). ''The handbook of speech perception''. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-6312-2927-2.
* Rogers, Henry. (2000). ''The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics''. Harlow, Essex: Pearson. ISBN 0-582-38182-7.
*Rogers, Henry. (2000). ''The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics''. Harlow, Essex: Pearson. ISBN 0-582-38182-7.
* Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). ''Acoustic phonetics''. Current studies in linguistics (No. 30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-2621-9404-X.
*Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). ''Acoustic phonetics''. Current studies in linguistics (No. 30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-2621-9404-X.


[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Linguistics Workgroup]]
[[Category:Linguistics Workgroup]]

Revision as of 01:04, 15 July 2007

Linguistics
Phonology
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Theoretical linguistics
Generative linguistics
Cognitive linguistics
Language acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Applied linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Creolistics
Evolutionary linguistics
Linguistic variation
Linguistic typology
Anthropological linguistics
Computational linguistics
Descriptive linguistics
Historical linguistics
Comparative linguistics
History of linguistics
Languagenaturalconstructed
Grammar

Phonetics[1] is the study of sounds and the human voice. It is concerned with the actual properties of speech sounds (phones) as well as those of non-speech sounds, and their production, audition and perception, as opposed to phonology, which is the study of abstract units (such as phonemes and distinctive features) which underlie both speech and writing. Phonetics deals with the sounds themselves rather than the contexts in which they are used in languages. Discussions of meaning (semantics) do not enter at this level of linguistic analysis, therefore.

While writing systems and alphabets often attempt to represent the sounds of speech, phoneticians are more concerned with the sounds themselves than the symbols used to represent them. So close is the relationship between them, however, that many dictionaries list the study of the symbols (more accurately semiotics) as a part of phonetic studies. Logographic writing systems typically give much less phonetic information, although it is not necessarily non-existent. For instance, in Chinese characters, a phonetic is a portion of the character that hints at its pronunciation, while the radical gives semantic information. Characters featuring the same phonetic typically have similar pronunciations, but by no means are the pronunciations predictably determined by the phonetic; this is because pronunciations diverged over many centuries while the characters remained the same. Not all Chinese characters are radical-phonetic compounds, but a good majority of them are.

Phonetics has three main branches:

  • articulatory phonetics, concerned with the positions and movements of the lips, tongue, vocal tract and folds and other speech organs in producing speech;
  • acoustic phonetics, concerned with the properties of the sound waves and how they are received by the inner ear;
  • auditory phonetics, concerned with speech perception, principally how the brain forms perceptual representations of the input it receives.

There are over a hundred different phones recognized as distinctive by the International Phonetic Association (IPA) and transcribed in their International Phonetic Alphabet.

Phonetics was studied as early as 2500 years ago in ancient India, with Pāṇini's account of the place and manner of articulation of consonants in his 5th century BCE treatise on Sanskrit. The major Indic alphabets today, except Tamil script, order their consonants according to Pāṇini's classification.

Phonetics often involves modern technology to analyse speech. This spectrogram as used in acoustic phonetics shows the frequencies of vibrations involved in the production of six British English vowels by an adult male native speaker: from left to right, the vowels as in bee, sue, herd, or, bar and buy. The bands of energy (formants) are distinctive for each vowel; for example, the lower the bottom formant ('F1'), the higher the vowel is articulated in the mouth. This image was created using the Praat freeware program.

See also

External links and references

Bibliography

  • Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32520-X.
  • Clark, John; & Yallop, Colin. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19452-5.
  • Hardcastle, William J.; & Laver, John (Eds.). (1997). The handbook of phonetic sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-6311-8848-7.
  • Ladefoged, Peter. (1982). A course in phonetics (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-23269-9 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-23270-2 (pbk).
  • Ladefoged, Peter; & Maddieson, Ian. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-631-19814-8 (hbk); ISBN 0-631-19815-6 (pbk).
  • Maddieson, Ian. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Pisoni, David B.; & Remez, Robert E. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of speech perception. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-6312-2927-2.
  • Rogers, Henry. (2000). The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. Harlow, Essex: Pearson. ISBN 0-582-38182-7.
  • Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Current studies in linguistics (No. 30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-2621-9404-X.
  1. From the Greek word φωνή, phone = sound/voice.