CZ Talk:Redirects: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (Daniel, can you agree?) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→Lemmas) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 19:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 19:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I see what you mean and agree with most of it. Have edited accordingly. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 19:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Lemmas== | |||
Daniel, I don't see what is gained by the examples of "[[CZ:Redirects#Lemma_article_with_redirect_functionality|Lemma article with redirect functionality]]." I just don't see the redirect functionality. Am I missing something? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
:A written redirect rather than an auto redirect? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 19:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
::It is not a redirect in the classical sense but it re-directs attention to the existing cluster (in the example case, [[Haber process]]), though after clarifying that [[Haber-Bosch process]] does not have entirely the same meaning. I am open for better examples where two meanings are close enough to be linked by redirects but distinct enough to merit turning the redirect into a lemma that links to the former redirect target. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 9 March 2010
When to use redirects
Daniel, I do not agree with your "there is no harm" in being generous with redirects.
I hope you can accept my formulations asking to be cautious when using redirects to use.
--Peter Schmitt 19:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- I see what you mean and agree with most of it. Have edited accordingly. --Daniel Mietchen 19:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Lemmas
Daniel, I don't see what is gained by the examples of "Lemma article with redirect functionality." I just don't see the redirect functionality. Am I missing something? Russell D. Jones 18:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- A written redirect rather than an auto redirect? Chris Day 19:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not a redirect in the classical sense but it re-directs attention to the existing cluster (in the example case, Haber process), though after clarifying that Haber-Bosch process does not have entirely the same meaning. I am open for better examples where two meanings are close enough to be linked by redirects but distinct enough to merit turning the redirect into a lemma that links to the former redirect target. --Daniel Mietchen 21:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)