Talk:Entropy (thermodynamics): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Length of inset: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Length of inset ==
On the page  [[User talk:Daniel_Mietchen]] there was the following short discussion initiated by a request of  [[User: Paul Wormer]] to Daniel to check the translation given in the inset.
I put my version directly on the [[:Image:Text_entropy.png|image page]] but think the article may merit a shorter version. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 18:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
:Yes I had some doubts myself about the length of the inset. On the other hand, I have seen so many mistakes in the quotation and also because  Clausius thought of the name ''Verwandlungsinhalt'', that I thought it would be interesting to have it. Maybe just the translation is sufficient and a good compromise?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
::That would be a possibility but I am generally in favour of showing excerpts from original sources, and ''Verwandlungsinhalt'' is certainly instructive. So I pasted the whole translation in for the time being. Let's take another look at this after a while, or ask others, and decide then. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 08:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Question to other citizens: anybody has an opinion about the inset and its length? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:16, 9 November 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Thermodynamic variable S appearing in the second law of thermodynamics. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Physics, Chemistry and Engineering [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Length of inset

On the page User talk:Daniel_Mietchen there was the following short discussion initiated by a request of User: Paul Wormer to Daniel to check the translation given in the inset.

I put my version directly on the image page but think the article may merit a shorter version. --Daniel Mietchen 18:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes I had some doubts myself about the length of the inset. On the other hand, I have seen so many mistakes in the quotation and also because Clausius thought of the name Verwandlungsinhalt, that I thought it would be interesting to have it. Maybe just the translation is sufficient and a good compromise?--Paul Wormer 07:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
That would be a possibility but I am generally in favour of showing excerpts from original sources, and Verwandlungsinhalt is certainly instructive. So I pasted the whole translation in for the time being. Let's take another look at this after a while, or ask others, and decide then. --Daniel Mietchen 08:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Question to other citizens: anybody has an opinion about the inset and its length? --Paul Wormer 10:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)