Associated Legendre function/Proofs: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dan Nessett
(New page: This article proves that the Associated Legendre Functions are orthogonal and derives their normalization constant. ==Theorem== <math>\int\limits_{-1}^{1}P_{l}^{m} \left( x\right) P_{k}...)
 
imported>Dan Nessett
(Changed "article" to "addendum" in first sentence)
Line 1: Line 1:
This article proves that the Associated Legendre Functions are orthogonal and derives their normalization constant.
This addendum proves that the Associated Legendre Functions are orthogonal and derives their normalization constant.


==Theorem==  
==Theorem==  

Revision as of 10:24, 11 July 2009

This addendum proves that the Associated Legendre Functions are orthogonal and derives their normalization constant.

Theorem

[Note: This proof uses the more common notation, rather than ]

Where:

Proof

The Associated Legendre Functions are regular solutions to the general Legendre equation: , where

This equation is an example of a more general class of equations known as the Sturm-Liouville equations. Using Sturm-Liouville theory, one can show that vanishes when However, one can find directly from the above definition, whether or not

Since and occur symmetrically, one can without loss of generality assume that Integrate by parts times, where the curly brackets in the integral indicate the factors, the first being and the second For each of the first integrations by parts, in the term contains the factor ; so the term vanishes. For each of the remaining integrations, in that term contains the factor ; so the term also vanishes. This means:

Expand the second factor using Leibnitz' rule:

The leftmost derivative in the sum is non-zero only when (remembering that ). The other derivative is non-zero only when , that is, when Because these two conditions imply that the only non-zero term in the sum occurs when and So:

To evaluate the differentiated factors, expand using the binomial theorem: The only thing that survives differentiation times is the term, which (after differentiation) equals: . Therefore:

................................................. (1)

Evaluate by a change of variable: Thus, [To eliminate the negative sign on the second integral, the limits are switched from to , recalling that and ].

A table of standard trigonometric integrals shows: Since for Applying this result to and changing the variable back to yields: for Using this recursively:

Applying this result to (1):

QED.

See also

References

  • Kenneth Franklin Riley, Michael Paul Hobson, Stephen John Bence, "Mathematical methods for physics and engineering", pg. 590, (2006) 3 Edition, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-67971-0.