Hamdi v. Rumsfeld/Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: <noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude> A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms a...) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 23:17, 3 March 2009
A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms against the United States, still was entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if he was an enemy combatant subject to military, rather than civilian, law