CZ Talk:Subgroups: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tom Kelly
imported>Tom Kelly
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Needs similar subgroups? ==
== Needs similar subgroups? ==


In the case of medical physiology.  I made the home page for the [[CZ:Cardiovascular Subgroup]] and it is pending approval of Biology and Health Sciences workgroups.  It is best fit for Health Sciences, however, physiologists are more like biologists... aren't they?  So, in the case of the Cardiovascular Subgroup, I would say it would be nice in the template if we could LINK over to the [[CZ:Physiology Subgroup]] since no workgroup exists for it at this time.
just thought of medical physiology.  I made the home page for the [[CZ:Cardiovascular Subgroup]] and it is pending approval of Biology and Health Sciences workgroups.  It is best fit for Health Sciences, however, physiologists are more like biologists... aren't they?  So, in the case of the Cardiovascular Subgroup, I would say it would be nice in the template if we could LINK over to the [[CZ:Physiology Subgroup]] since no workgroup exists for it at this time.

Revision as of 02:08, 4 April 2009

Needs similar subgroups?

just thought of medical physiology. I made the home page for the CZ:Cardiovascular Subgroup and it is pending approval of Biology and Health Sciences workgroups. It is best fit for Health Sciences, however, physiologists are more like biologists... aren't they? So, in the case of the Cardiovascular Subgroup, I would say it would be nice in the template if we could LINK over to the CZ:Physiology Subgroup since no workgroup exists for it at this time.