Allopathy: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (removed redundant sentence) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (perfect time to use this word!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Allopathy''' is a term | '''Allopathy''' is a term coined sometime in the late 18th century by [[Samuel Hahnemann]], a German physician who was the founder of [[homeopathy]]. Derived from the [[Greek language|Greek]] (''ἄλλος'', ''állos'', other, different + ''πάϑος'', ''páthos'', suffering), "allopathy" was meant to be contrasted to his own theory of "homeopathy", whose underlying concept was "like cures like" and was based on "the principle of similars". Allopathy, therefore, according to Hahnemann, because it was based on "the principle of opposites", was supposed to characterize all other types of medical theories and applications. The term itself derives from the Greek ''ἄλλος'', ''állos'', other, different + ''πάϑος'', ''páthos'', suffering. | ||
The term was used frequently throughout the first half of the 19th century, particularly in the United States, to describe various forms of [[Medicine|conventional medicine]], even by non-homeopathic practitioners themselves. In the last half of that century, however, it came under attack by increasingly powerful medical associations and by the turn of the 20th century it had fallen into disrepute. Forty years later, during which time conventional medicine had begun to adopt a firmly scientific basis, the 1941 printing of the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', had, in its 23-volume set, a one-page article on homeopathy, 34 pages devoted to "Medicine" and "Medical" off-shoots, but no article at all about allopathy. Even its index, comprising an entire volume of 978 pages, made no mention of it. | The term was used frequently throughout the first half of the 19th century, particularly in the United States, to describe various forms of [[Medicine|conventional medicine]], even by non-homeopathic practitioners themselves. In the last half of that century, however, it came under attack by increasingly powerful medical associations and by the turn of the 20th century it had fallen into disrepute. Forty years later, during which time conventional medicine had begun to adopt a firmly scientific basis, the 1941 printing of the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', had, in its 23-volume set, a one-page article on homeopathy, 34 pages devoted to "Medicine" and "Medical" off-shoots, but no article at all about allopathy. Even its index, comprising an entire volume of 978 pages, made no mention of it. | ||
The term, however, is still used occasionally today, generally in a disparaging fashion, by some practitioners of [[Alternative medicine|alternative medicine]] to characterize what others call conventional medicine. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | The term, however, is still used occasionally today, generally in a disparaging fashion, by some practitioners of [[Alternative medicine|alternative medicine]] to characterize what others call conventional medicine. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 4 January 2009
Allopathy is a term coined sometime in the late 18th century by Samuel Hahnemann, a German physician who was the founder of homeopathy. Derived from the Greek (ἄλλος, állos, other, different + πάϑος, páthos, suffering), "allopathy" was meant to be contrasted to his own theory of "homeopathy", whose underlying concept was "like cures like" and was based on "the principle of similars". Allopathy, therefore, according to Hahnemann, because it was based on "the principle of opposites", was supposed to characterize all other types of medical theories and applications. The term itself derives from the Greek ἄλλος, állos, other, different + πάϑος, páthos, suffering.
The term was used frequently throughout the first half of the 19th century, particularly in the United States, to describe various forms of conventional medicine, even by non-homeopathic practitioners themselves. In the last half of that century, however, it came under attack by increasingly powerful medical associations and by the turn of the 20th century it had fallen into disrepute. Forty years later, during which time conventional medicine had begun to adopt a firmly scientific basis, the 1941 printing of the Encyclopedia Britannica, had, in its 23-volume set, a one-page article on homeopathy, 34 pages devoted to "Medicine" and "Medical" off-shoots, but no article at all about allopathy. Even its index, comprising an entire volume of 978 pages, made no mention of it.
The term, however, is still used occasionally today, generally in a disparaging fashion, by some practitioners of alternative medicine to characterize what others call conventional medicine. Hayford Peirce 03:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)