William Colby: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{TOC-right}} '''William Colby''' was a career U.S. intelligence and special operations oficer, who became Director of Central Intelligence and had numerous operational responsibilitie...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| title = Oral History interview by Ted Gittinger | | title = Oral History interview by Ted Gittinger | ||
| publisher = Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library}}, pp. I-1 to I-3</ref> | | publisher = Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library}}, pp. I-1 to I-3</ref> | ||
==CIA analysis== | |||
CIA did produce very good analysis of Vietnam as well as do effective operations, but, Colby believed the analysts became less effective, after 1968, when they were somewhat infected with the | |||
general academic view of Vietnam as a lost cause. I don't | |||
think they paid enough direct attention to what was actually | |||
happening but instead were hung on their earlier | |||
projections. Because what was actually happening was, I | |||
think, that change in the country atmosphere that I was | |||
demonstrating. That doesn't mean that the North Vietnamese | |||
were going to quit; the question was whether the North | |||
Vietnamese could be pushed back to the borders and then held | |||
there."<ref>Colby, p. I-12</ref> | |||
While he did not suggest a defeat of North Vietnam was possible, he did seem to suggest that a situation, such as on the Korean Peninsula, might emerge, had the U.S. been more supportive even without ground involvement. His argument was "But I think the contrast is between 1972 and 1975. In | |||
1972, with large-scale logistic support, with a minute | |||
number of Americans--I don't think there were any combat | |||
forces to speak of there--and some B-52 bombing ([[Operation LINEBACKER I]] and [[Operation LINEBACKER II]]), they | |||
stopped the North Vietnamese, and it was South Vietnamese | |||
forces that stood up and did it. In 1975, when their | |||
munitions had been cut back very substantially by the | |||
Congress, when Congress said no, it wasn't going to get them | |||
another appropriation for even the weapons of war, and | |||
there's certainly no possibility of B-52 help, they failed."<ref>Colby, p. I-13</ref> | |||
==Second World War== | ==Second World War== | ||
Colby commanded field units of the [[Office of Strategic Services]], first parachuting into France to harass German units. <ref name=Independent11996-05-97>{{citation | Colby commanded field units of the [[Office of Strategic Services]], first parachuting into France to harass German units. <ref name=Independent11996-05-97>{{citation |
Revision as of 11:56, 23 November 2008
Template:TOC-right William Colby was a career U.S. intelligence and special operations oficer, who became Director of Central Intelligence and had numerous operational responsibilities during Vietnam War. His autobiography was entitled Honorable Men, and he believed that a nation had to believe such people made up its intelligence service.[1] In December 1974, Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh broke the news of the "Family Jewels" in a front-page article in The New York Times, revealing that the CIA had assassinated foreign leaders, and had conducted surveillance on some seven thousand American citizens involved in the antiwar movement (Operation CHAOS).
Congress responded to the "Family Jewels" in 1975, investigating the CIA in the Senate via the Church Committee, chaired by Senator Frank Church (D-Idaho), and in the House of Representatives via the Pike Committee, chaired by Congressman Otis Pike (D-NY). President Gerald Ford created the aforementioned Rockefeller Commission, and issued an Executive Order prohibiting the assassination of foreign leaders.
Colby's tenure as DCI congressional investigations into alleged U.S. intelligence malfeasance over the preceding twenty-five years. Colby cooperated, not out of a desire for major reforms, but in the belief that the actual scope of such misdeeds was not great enough to cause lasting damage to the CIA's reputation. He believed that cooperating with Congress was the only way to save the Agency from dissolution. Colby also believed that the CIA had a moral obligation to cooperate with the Congress and demonstrate that the CIA was accountable to the Constitution. This caused a major rift within the CIA ranks, with many old-line officers such as former DCI Richard Helms believing that the CIA should have resisted congressional intrusion.
Tenure as DCI
Colby's time as DCI (1973-1976) was also eventful on the world stage. Shortly after he assumed leadership, the Yom Kippur War broke out, an event that surprised not only the American intelligence agencies but also the Israelis. This intelligence surprise reportedly affected Colby's credibility with the Nixon Administration.
Meanwhile, after many years of involvement, South Vietnam fell to Communist forces in April 1975, a particularly difficult blow for Colby, who had dedicated so much of his life and career to the American effort there.
Events in the arms control field, Angola, the Middle East, and elsewhere also demanded attention.
Vietnam
Coup attempt of 1961
Since it did not overthrow a government, the coup attempt against the Ngo Dinh Diem is much less known than the 1963 overthrow of Diem. Nevertheless, Colby believes that CIA monitoring of the attempt revealed a good deal about tensions inside the South Vietnamese government. Part of the issue was dissatisfaction of the political and Strategic Hamlet Program under Diem's brther, Ngo Dinh Nhu. Col. Nguyen Chanh Thi did not expect to overthrow Diem, but force more aggressive action against the enemy. [2]
CIA analysis
CIA did produce very good analysis of Vietnam as well as do effective operations, but, Colby believed the analysts became less effective, after 1968, when they were somewhat infected with the general academic view of Vietnam as a lost cause. I don't think they paid enough direct attention to what was actually happening but instead were hung on their earlier projections. Because what was actually happening was, I think, that change in the country atmosphere that I was demonstrating. That doesn't mean that the North Vietnamese were going to quit; the question was whether the North Vietnamese could be pushed back to the borders and then held there."[3]
While he did not suggest a defeat of North Vietnam was possible, he did seem to suggest that a situation, such as on the Korean Peninsula, might emerge, had the U.S. been more supportive even without ground involvement. His argument was "But I think the contrast is between 1972 and 1975. In 1972, with large-scale logistic support, with a minute number of Americans--I don't think there were any combat forces to speak of there--and some B-52 bombing (Operation LINEBACKER I and Operation LINEBACKER II), they stopped the North Vietnamese, and it was South Vietnamese forces that stood up and did it. In 1975, when their munitions had been cut back very substantially by the Congress, when Congress said no, it wasn't going to get them another appropriation for even the weapons of war, and there's certainly no possibility of B-52 help, they failed."[4]
Second World War
Colby commanded field units of the Office of Strategic Services, first parachuting into France to harass German units. [5]A unit under his command later took most of the German surrender in Norway. [6]
References
- ↑ Colby, William; Peter Forbath (1978). Honourable Men: My Life in the CIA. London: Hutchinson. ISBN 009134820X. OCLC 16424505.
- ↑ William Colby (March 1, 1982), Oral History interview by Ted Gittinger, Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library, pp. I-1 to I-3
- ↑ Colby, p. I-12
- ↑ Colby, p. I-13
- ↑ Pringle, Peter (May 7, 1996), "William Colby: Obituary", Independen (U.K.)
- ↑ Hall, Roger, You're stepping on my cloak and dagger.