Talk:Vesalius: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer (→Fonts: new section) |
imported>Brian P. Long (→A few additions: new section) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Anthony, I see that you give different literal quotations. They are all in a different font/size/color. Is there a system to it?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | Anthony, I see that you give different literal quotations. They are all in a different font/size/color. Is there a system to it?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== A few additions == | |||
Hi Anthony-- | |||
I've been doing some reading over the past year, and I thought we might make some additions to the Vesalius article, but wasn't sure where to begin. Do you mind if I just dive into your section on "Vesalius' Work"? | |||
If you're interested, I've been reading Cunningham's Anatomical Renaissance. I thought his section on Galen's self-presentation was particularly interesting. Furthermore, I thought we should balance your treatment of his anatomical achievement a bit-- by mentioning, for example, that Vesalius continued to give (and draw!) the Galenic number of lobes of the liver even though he should have been able to see the correct number for himeself. I think I read a discussion of this in 'The Western Medical Tradition: 800 BC-AD 1800', ed. Conrad et al., but I'll have to check. | |||
Hope you're well, | |||
[[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 16:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:27, 28 August 2011
Beginning of article on Vesalius for July Write-a-Thon 2008
Biography: life, work and times) on the Flemish anatomist/physiologist, Andreas Vesalius. --Anthony.Sebastian 12:55, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
Fonts
Anthony, I see that you give different literal quotations. They are all in a different font/size/color. Is there a system to it?--Paul Wormer 11:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
A few additions
Hi Anthony--
I've been doing some reading over the past year, and I thought we might make some additions to the Vesalius article, but wasn't sure where to begin. Do you mind if I just dive into your section on "Vesalius' Work"?
If you're interested, I've been reading Cunningham's Anatomical Renaissance. I thought his section on Galen's self-presentation was particularly interesting. Furthermore, I thought we should balance your treatment of his anatomical achievement a bit-- by mentioning, for example, that Vesalius continued to give (and draw!) the Galenic number of lobes of the liver even though he should have been able to see the correct number for himeself. I think I read a discussion of this in 'The Western Medical Tradition: 800 BC-AD 1800', ed. Conrad et al., but I'll have to check.
Hope you're well, Brian P. Long 16:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Health Sciences Category Check
- History Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag