Talk:Battle of Britain: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Kelly (→any pictures?: new section) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Finding releasable ones is the problem) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
any pictures that could go in this article? [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 12:31, 20 September 2008 (CDT) | any pictures that could go in this article? [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 12:31, 20 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Any suggestions for U.K. copyright-free/PD photos? IIRC, the RAF doesn't just release them as does the USAF. I have seen some good maps and diagrams, but, again, it's a rights problem. Anybody in the UK near a museum and could take some pictures? There are probably some U.S. military photos of the German aircraft, but it's a good question if the aircraft alone, rather than showing how they were used, adds that much to an article. | |||
:I'd probably have to redraw the radars, and a drawing is definitely preferable to a photo; thin lattices do not photograph well. I haven't illustrated [[radar]]; I just wasn't sure how much people would be interested in antennas, or displays that are fairly incomprehensible without training (drawings often explain better). [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 12:38, 20 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:38, 20 September 2008
second paragraph
The second paragraph comes from out of the blue, doesn't relate to the first paragraph at all, and, unless, the reader already knows a lot about the Battle of Britain, is essentially meaningless. For instance: "the fighters" -- what fighters? what were they doing? why? "the radars" -- what radars? etc. etc. I hesitate to simply delete the whole paragraph, but it should either be greatly expanded, greatly rewritten, or moved somewhere else. Hayford Peirce 00:16, 17 June 2008 (CDT)
any pictures?
any pictures that could go in this article? Tom Kelly 12:31, 20 September 2008 (CDT)
- Any suggestions for U.K. copyright-free/PD photos? IIRC, the RAF doesn't just release them as does the USAF. I have seen some good maps and diagrams, but, again, it's a rights problem. Anybody in the UK near a museum and could take some pictures? There are probably some U.S. military photos of the German aircraft, but it's a good question if the aircraft alone, rather than showing how they were used, adds that much to an article.
- I'd probably have to redraw the radars, and a drawing is definitely preferable to a photo; thin lattices do not photograph well. I haven't illustrated radar; I just wasn't sure how much people would be interested in antennas, or displays that are fairly incomprehensible without training (drawings often explain better). Howard C. Berkowitz 12:38, 20 September 2008 (CDT)