Talk:Official English movement: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(This article uses biased language on its own account, it seems...)
imported>John Stephenson
(changed name to 'official English movement' - though this is not exactly neutral either)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term.  Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given.  The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a ''different'' term.  Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] could be given.  The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)
:OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 02:25, 10 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Campaigns in the USA which call for English to be made the only official language of the country; a common name for this is 'English Only', often used by civil liberties groups to describe the debate, but supporters usually prefer 'pro-English' or 'official English'. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Linguistics, Education and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

I don't know much about this topic, but on the evidence of the article itself, "English Only" is a biased term, a term used within the article itself for a point of view that is described by its adherents using a different term. Hence, no clearer example of a violation of our Neutrality Policy could be given. The usual advice is appropriate--find, if possible, a neutral term, and for the article title, either that neutral term or else a term to describe the debate. --Larry Sanger 18:38, 4 June 2008 (CDT)

OK, I have changed it - the new one is what some scholars have used (e.g. James Crawford). However, there is really no neutral title we could have here, and 'English Only7 is a very widespread term. John Stephenson 03:25, 10 June 2008 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Official_English_movement&oldid=486849"