Affirmative action: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(I see that it's AE for language, so changed one word to double quotes)
imported>Shamira Gelbman
("Civil Rights Act" -> "Civil Rights Act of 1964" to avoid confusion with previous CRAs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


'''Affirmative action''' is a policy of giving preference or favor to members of groups (such as racial minorities and women) who have suffered past discrimination or prejudice, in order to increase their representation in [[University|universities]], business, public services (like the [[Police]]) and government. In the [[United States]], affirmative action was allowed as a remedy to racial injustice by the 1964 [[Civil Rights Act]], although a series of decisions by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] have restricted its scope. In addition, in a number of states, referenda have limited the use of affirmative action policies in those states.
'''Affirmative action''' is a policy of giving preference or favor to members of groups (such as racial minorities and women) who have suffered past discrimination or prejudice, in order to increase their representation in [[University|universities]], business, public services (like the [[Police]]) and government. In the [[United States]], affirmative action was allowed as a remedy to racial injustice by the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]], although a series of decisions by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] have restricted its scope. In addition, in a number of states, referenda have limited the use of affirmative action policies in those states.


Justifications of affirmative action tend to either that it solves an individual, personal injustice or that it increases diversity, which is good for the society and institution, and helps prevent future inequality by acting as a obligation to the institution to confront its own past and present inequality.
Justifications of affirmative action tend to either that it solves an individual, personal injustice or that it increases diversity, which is good for the society and institution, and helps prevent future inequality by acting as a obligation to the institution to confront its own past and present inequality.


Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is a form of "reverse" discrimination, that those favoured by affirmative action policies are being promoted over better-qualified candidates, and that a candidate placed in a position because of an affirmative action policy may not have as much respect as if they had been placed in that position through a meritocratic system instead. It also continues to promote racial awareness and racial divisions, through governmental and legal decisions based on the racial identity of people.
Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is a form of "reverse" discrimination, that those favoured by affirmative action policies are being promoted over better-qualified candidates, and that a candidate placed in a position because of an affirmative action policy may not have as much respect as if they had been placed in that position through a meritocratic system instead. It also continues to promote racial awareness and racial divisions, through governmental and legal decisions based on the racial identity of people.

Revision as of 16:26, 28 April 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Affirmative action is a policy of giving preference or favor to members of groups (such as racial minorities and women) who have suffered past discrimination or prejudice, in order to increase their representation in universities, business, public services (like the Police) and government. In the United States, affirmative action was allowed as a remedy to racial injustice by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, although a series of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court have restricted its scope. In addition, in a number of states, referenda have limited the use of affirmative action policies in those states.

Justifications of affirmative action tend to either that it solves an individual, personal injustice or that it increases diversity, which is good for the society and institution, and helps prevent future inequality by acting as a obligation to the institution to confront its own past and present inequality.

Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is a form of "reverse" discrimination, that those favoured by affirmative action policies are being promoted over better-qualified candidates, and that a candidate placed in a position because of an affirmative action policy may not have as much respect as if they had been placed in that position through a meritocratic system instead. It also continues to promote racial awareness and racial divisions, through governmental and legal decisions based on the racial identity of people.