Talk:Royal New South Wales Canine Council: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleta Curry m (New page: {{subpages}} {{WPauthor|}}) |
imported>David Finn (→Expand or delete: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{WPauthor|}} | {{WPauthor|}} | ||
== Expand or delete == | |||
[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:Joseph_Krol&diff=100788458&oldid=100786734 Our general policy is to encourage people to write to the full extent and limit of their knowledge on a subject, rather than just to put down a sentence or two with random statistics. That latter approach seems to work well at wikis with thousands or hundreds of thousands of users, where somebody will come along and expand on one's work within just a few hours. Here at CZ, it's been consistently upheld that the emphasis should be on quality rather than quantity. In fact, several years ago, some people said we shouldn't allow 'stubs' at all. The final consensus, though, was that stubs were okay as long as you wrote a really good stub.] [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 04:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:47, 17 November 2011
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
Expand or delete
Our general policy is to encourage people to write to the full extent and limit of their knowledge on a subject, rather than just to put down a sentence or two with random statistics. That latter approach seems to work well at wikis with thousands or hundreds of thousands of users, where somebody will come along and expand on one's work within just a few hours. Here at CZ, it's been consistently upheld that the emphasis should be on quality rather than quantity. In fact, several years ago, some people said we shouldn't allow 'stubs' at all. The final consensus, though, was that stubs were okay as long as you wrote a really good stub. David Finn 04:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)