Bowers v.Hardwick/Definition: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Roger A. Lohmann
(Create definition)
 
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In a closely divided (5-4) case originating in Georgia, in 1986 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right of privacy did not apply to homosexual conduct. Michael Harwick had been arrested on a sodomy charge after policy entered his house to serve a traffic warrant and found him in bed with another man.
<noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude>
In a closely divided (5-4) case originating in Georgia, in 1986 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right of privacy did not apply to homosexual conduct. Michael Harwick had been arrested on a sodomy charge after police entered his house to serve a traffic warrant and found him in bed with another man.

Latest revision as of 22:02, 22 May 2008

This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.


Bowers v.Hardwick [r]: In a closely divided (5-4) case originating in Georgia, in 1986 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right of privacy did not apply to homosexual conduct. Michael Harwick had been arrested on a sodomy charge after police entered his house to serve a traffic warrant and found him in bed with another man.