Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw-190: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Carlos Ferreira
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
# Fw 190
# Fw 190
We need to have a copyeditor type who gives a *&$@ figure out exactly which is "most correct." --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:29, 5 March 2008 (CST)
We need to have a copyeditor type who gives a *&$@ figure out exactly which is "most correct." --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:29, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Yeah, I realized that problem with the spelling. I have some bibliography somewhere around here, I'll see to it. --[[User:Carlos Ferreira|Carlos Ferreira]] 14:07, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Well, I found my references, and the most reliable ones quote the FW 190. Aparently, the most reliable sources don't insert the hyphen. I'm goingo to delete all the hyphens in the text, but I can't edit the title, or can I?--[[User:Carlos Ferreira|Carlos Ferreira]] 17:39, 6 March 2008 (CST)

Latest revision as of 17:39, 6 March 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A second-generation propeller-driven German fighter aircraft of WWII; heavier and higher in performance than the Messerschmitt Me-109 [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Military [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Cleaned up the article, regularized spelling and punctuation, etc. There are many terms used without any explanation. In most cases this is probably all right, but some in-line explanations of a few items would be helpful. Interesting!

One other thing. I notice on Google that this plane is referred to as:

  1. Fw-190 (as you have it)
  2. FW-190
  3. FW 190
  4. Fw 190

We need to have a copyeditor type who gives a *&$@ figure out exactly which is "most correct." --Larry Sanger 12:29, 5 March 2008 (CST)


Yeah, I realized that problem with the spelling. I have some bibliography somewhere around here, I'll see to it. --Carlos Ferreira 14:07, 5 March 2008 (CST) Well, I found my references, and the most reliable ones quote the FW 190. Aparently, the most reliable sources don't insert the hyphen. I'm goingo to delete all the hyphens in the text, but I can't edit the title, or can I?--Carlos Ferreira 17:39, 6 March 2008 (CST)