Number theory/Signed Articles/Elementary diophantine approximations: Difference between revisions
imported>Wlodzimierz Holsztynski |
imported>John Stephenson m (John Stephenson moved page WYA:Elementary diophantine approximations to Number theory/Signed Articles/Elementary diophantine approximations without leaving a redirect: article from old initiative) |
||
(93 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
How well can real numbers (all of them or the special ones) be approximated by rational numbers? A typical Diophantine approximation result states: | How well can real numbers (all of them or the special ones) be approximated by rational numbers? A typical Diophantine approximation result states: | ||
'''Theorem''' Let <math>\ a</math> be an arbitrary real number. Then | '''Theorem''' Let <math>\ a</math> be an arbitrary real number. Then | ||
* <math>\ a</math> is rational | * <math>\ a</math> is rational <math>\Leftrightarrow</math> there exists a real number C > 0 such that | ||
:::<math>|a - \frac{x}{y}| > \frac{C}{y}</math> | :::<math>\left|a - \frac{x}{y}\right| > \frac{C}{y}</math> | ||
for arbitrary integers <math>\ (x,y)</math> such that <math>\ y>0</math> and <math>\ a\ne \frac{x}{y};</math> | for arbitrary integers <math>\ (x,y)</math> such that <math>\ y>0</math> and <math>\ a\ne \frac{x}{y};</math> | ||
* ([[Adolph Hurwitz]]) <math>\ a</math> is irrational | * ([[Adolph Hurwitz]]) <math>\ a</math> is irrational <math>\Leftrightarrow</math> there exist infinitely many pairs of integers <math>\ (x,y)</math> such that <math>\ y>0</math> and | ||
:::<math>\left|a - \frac{x}{y}\right| < \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot y^2}.</math> | |||
'''Remark''' Implication <math>\Leftarrow</math> of the first part of the theorem is a simple and satisfaction bringing exercise. | |||
== Notation == | == Notation == | ||
Line 43: | Line 47: | ||
== The method of neighbors and median == | == The method of neighbors and median == | ||
In this section we will quickly obtain some results about approximating irrational numbers by rational | In this section we will quickly obtain some results about approximating irrational numbers by rational. To this end we will not worry about the details of the difference between a rational number and a fraction (with integer numerator and denominator)—this will not cause any problems; fully crisp notions will be developed in the next sections, they will involve 2-dimensional vectors and 2x2 matrices. This section is still introductory. It is supposed to provide quick insight into the topic. | ||
=== Definitions === | |||
Fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with | Fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with integer numerators and natural denominators, are called '''neighbors''' (in the given order) <math>\Leftarrow:\Rightarrow</math> | ||
:::<math>\frac{a}{c}-\frac{b}{d}\ =\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | :::<math>\frac{a}{c}-\frac{b}{d}\ =\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | ||
Fraction <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> is called the '''top neighbor''' of the other, | Fraction <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> is called the '''top neighbor''' of the other, <math>\frac{b}{d}</math> is called the '''bottom neighbor''', and the interval <math>\ \mathit{Span}(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d})</math> is called '''neighborhood'''; thus a neighborhood is an open interval such that its endpoints are neighbors. | ||
* If <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d}</math> are neighbors then <math>\ a\cdot b\ge 0</math> ( i.e. <math>\frac{a}{c}\cdot \frac{b}{d}\ \ge 0</math> ). | |||
* Let <math>\ a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}.</math> Fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d}</math> are neighbors <math>\Leftrightarrow</math> fractions <math>\frac{d}{b}</math> and <math>\frac{c}{a}</math> are neighbors <math>\Leftrightarrow</math> fractions <math>\frac{-b}{d}</math> and <math>\frac{-a}{c}</math> are neighbors. | |||
'''Examples:''' | '''Examples:''' | ||
Line 62: | Line 71: | ||
::: <math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{b}{d}</math> | ::: <math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{b}{d}</math> | ||
'''Definition''' A pair of neighboring fractions <math>\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right),</math> with integer numerators and natural denominators, is called a ''top pair'' <math>\Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ c > d.</math> Otherwise it is called a ''bottom pair''. | |||
Thus now we have notions of top/bottom neighbors and of top/bottom pairs of neighbors. | |||
* Let <math>\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right),</math> be a pair of neighbors. Then <math>\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{a+b}{c+d}\right)</math> is a top pair of neighbors, and <math>\left(\frac{a+b}{c+d},\frac{b}{d}\right)</math> is a bottom pair of neighbors. | |||
| |||
=== First results === | === First results === | ||
'''Theorem''' Let fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with | '''Theorem''' Let fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with integer numerators and natural denominators, be neighbors. Then | ||
:* if | :* if integers <math>\ t>0</math> and <math>\ s</math> are such that <math>\ \frac{a}{c} > \frac{s}{t} > \frac{b}{d},</math> then <math>t \ge c+d;</math> | ||
:* the '''median''' <math>\frac{a+b}{c+d}</math> is a bottom neighbor of <math>\frac{a}{c},</math> and a top neighbor of <math>\frac{b}{d};</math> | :* the '''median''' <math>\frac{a+b}{c+d}</math> is a bottom neighbor of <math>\frac{a}{c},</math> and a top neighbor of <math>\frac{b}{d};</math> | ||
Line 72: | Line 90: | ||
:* let <math>\ x</math> be an irrational number such that <math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{b}{d};</math> then | :* let <math>\ x</math> be an irrational number such that <math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{b}{d};</math> then | ||
:::<math>\max(\frac{a}{c}-x,\, x-\frac{b}{d})\ <\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | :::<math>0\ <\ \max(\frac{a}{c}-x,\, x-\frac{b}{d})\ <\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | ||
:and | :and | ||
:<math>\frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{ | :<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{2\cdot c^2}</math> or <math>0\ <\ x-\frac{b}{d}\ <\ \frac{1}{2\cdot d^2}</math> | ||
Line 93: | Line 111: | ||
which is the first part of our theorem. | which is the first part of our theorem. | ||
The second part of the theorem is obtained by a simple calculation, straight from the definition of the neighbors. | The second part of the theorem is obtained by a simple calculation, straight from the definition of the neighbors. | ||
The first inequality of the third part of the theorem is instant: | |||
:<math>\max(\frac{a}{c}-x,\, x-\frac{b}{d})\ <\ (\frac{a}{c}-x)+(x-\frac{b}{d})\ =\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | :<math>\max(\frac{a}{c}-x,\, x-\frac{b}{d})\ <\ (\frac{a}{c}-x)+(x-\frac{b}{d})\ =\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> | ||
Next, | Next, | ||
:<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ | |||
:::<math>\left(\frac{1}{c}-\frac{1}{d}\right)^2\ \ge\ 0</math> | |||
hence | |||
::<math>\frac{1}{2\cdot c^2}+\frac{1}{2\cdot d^2}\ \ge\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}\ =\ \frac{a}{c}-\frac{b}{d}</math> | |||
::::<math> =\ \left|\mathit{Span}(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d})\right|</math> | |||
and | |||
::<math>\frac{b}{d}+\frac{1}{2\cdot d^2}\ \ge\ \frac{a}{c}-\frac{1}{2\cdot c^2}</math> | |||
i.e. | |||
<math>\mathit{Span}\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{a}{c}-\frac{1}{2\cdot c^2}\right)\ \cup\ \mathit{Span}\left(\frac{b}{d}+\frac{1}{2\cdot d^2},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ \backslash\ \mathbb{Q}\ \supseteq\ \mathit{Span}\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ \backslash\ \mathbb{Q}</math> | |||
'''End of proof''' | |||
'''Corollary''' Let fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with integer numerators and natural denominators, be neighbors. Then, if integers <math>\ t>0</math> and <math>\ s</math> are such that <math>\ \frac{a}{c} > \frac{s}{t} > \frac{b}{d},</math> then either | |||
* <math>s=a+b\quad\and\quad t=c+d;</math> | |||
or | |||
* <math>t\ \ge\ c+d+\min(c,d)\ >\ c+d</math> | |||
| |||
=== Hurwitz theorem === | |||
:Let <math>\ x\in \mathbb{R}</math> be an arbitrary irrational number. Then | |||
::::<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot t^2}</math> | |||
:for infinitely many different <math>\ s,t\in\mathbb{Z} \backslash \{0\}.</math> | |||
==== Lemma 1 ==== | |||
Let <math>\ c,d\in\mathbb{N}.</math> Let <math>\ C:=c+d.</math> Then: | |||
:::<math>c^2-\sqrt{5}\!\cdot\! c\!\cdot\! d+d\,^2\ >\ 0</math> | |||
or | or | ||
:<math>\ | :::<math>C\,^2-\sqrt{5}\cdot\! C\!\cdot\! d+d\,^2\ >\ 0</math> | ||
'''Proof of lemma 1''' It's easy to show that <math>\sqrt{2}\cdot c \ne \sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}\cdot d.</math> Thus the square of <math>\ X := \sqrt{2}\cdot c - \sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}\cdot d</math> is positive. Now, | |||
:::<math>\sqrt{2}\cdot \sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}\ =\ \sqrt{5}-1</math> | |||
which means that we may write <math>\ X^2</math> as follows: | |||
:<math>2\!\cdot\! c^2\ -\ 2\!\cdot\!(\sqrt{5}-1)\cdot c\!\cdot\! d\ +\ (3-\sqrt{5})\!\cdot\! d\,^2\ >\ 0</math> | |||
i.e. | |||
:<math>(c^2-\sqrt{5}\cdot c\cdot d+d^2)\ +\ (C^2-\sqrt{5}\cdot C\cdot d+d^2)\ >\ 0</math> | |||
and lemma 1 follows. '''End of proof''' | |||
==== Lemma 2 ==== | |||
Let <math>\ a,b\in\mathbb{Z}</math> and <math>\ c,d\in\mathbb{N}.</math> Let <math>\ A:=a+b</math> and <math>\ C:=c+d.</math> Furthermore, let fractions <math>\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d},</math> be neighbors, and let: | |||
:::<math>\frac{A}{C}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{b}{d}</math> | |||
where <math>\ x</math> is real. Then one of the following three inequalities holds: | |||
:::* <math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot c^2}</math> | |||
:::* <math>0\ <\ \frac{A}{C}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot C^2}</math> | |||
::<math>\frac{ | :::* <math>0\ <\ x-\frac{b}{d}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot d^2}</math> | ||
::<math> | '''Proof''' There are two cases along the inequalities of Lemma 1. Let's assume the first one, which is equivalent to: | ||
:<math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot c^2} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot d\,^2}\ >\ \frac{1}{c\cdot d}\ =\ \frac{a}{c}-\frac{b}{d}\ =\ \left|\mathit{Span}\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\right|</math> | |||
Thus | |||
::<math>\frac{b}{d}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot d\,^2}\ >\ \frac{a}{c}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot c^2}</math> | |||
which means that | |||
::<math>\mathit{Span}\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{a}{c}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot c^2}\right)\ \cup\ \mathit{Span}\left(\frac{b}{d}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot d\,^2},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ \supseteq\ \mathit{Span}\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)</math> | |||
::::<math>\supseteq\ \mathit{Span}\left(\frac{A}{C},\frac{b}{d}\right)</math> | |||
Thus lemma 2 is proven when the first inequality of lemma 1 holds. By replacing in the above proof the lower case <math>\ a,c,</math> by the upper case <math>\ A,C,</math> we obtain the proof when the second inequality of lemma 1 holds. | |||
'''End of proof''' (of lemma 2) | |||
==== Lemma 2' ==== | |||
Let <math>\ a,b\in\mathbb{Z}</math> and <math>\ c,d\in\mathbb{N}.</math> Let <math>\ A:=a+b</math> and <math>\ C:=c+d.</math> Furthermore, let fractions <math>\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d},</math> be neighbors, and let: | |||
:::<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{A}{C}</math> | |||
where <math>\ x</math> is real. Then one of the following three inequalities holds: | |||
:::* <math>0\ <\ x - \frac{b}{d}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot d\,^2}</math> | |||
:::* <math>0\ <\ x-\frac{A}{C} <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot C^2}</math> | |||
:::* <math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot x^2}</math> | |||
'''Proof''' It's similar to the proof of lemma 2. Or one may apply lemma 2 to <math>\ x':=-x,\ a':=-b,\ b':=-a,</math> and <math>\ c':=d,\ d':=c</math>, which would provide us with the respective fraction <math>\frac{s'}{t'}.</math> Then the required <math>\ s,t,</math> are given by <math>s:=-s',\ t:=t'.</math> | |||
'''End of proof''' (of lemma 2') | |||
| |||
==== Proof of Hurwitz theorem ==== | |||
When <math>\ x</math> is irrational, then it is squeezed between infinitely many different pairs of neighbors (see part two of the theorem from the '''''First results''''' section). They provide infinitely many different required fractions <math>\frac{s}{t}</math> (see lemma 2 and 2' above; but it is not claimed, nor true, that different pairs of neighbors provide different required fractions). | |||
'''End of proof''' | '''End of proof''' | ||
Line 135: | Line 278: | ||
where in each of these two cases <math>\ n\in \mathbb{N}</math> is a respective unique positive integer. | where in each of these two cases <math>\ n\in \mathbb{N}</math> is a respective unique positive integer. | ||
It was mentioned in the previous section ('''''First results''''') that if fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with positive (or non-negative) integer numerators and denominators are neighbors then also the top and the bottom (''bot'' for short) pair: | It was mentioned in the previous section ('''''First results''''') that if fractions <math>\frac{a}{c}</math> and <math>\frac{b}{d},</math> with positive (or non-negative) integer numerators and denominators are neighbors then also the top and the bottom (''bot'' for short) pair: | ||
*<math>\mathit{top}\!\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ :=\ \left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{a+b}{b+d}\right)</math> | *<math>\mathit{top}\!\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ :=\ \left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{a+b}{b+d}\right)</math> | ||
Line 146: | Line 289: | ||
are both pairs of neighbors. | are both pairs of neighbors. | ||
Let <math>\ A_0</math> be a pair of neighbors, and <math>\ x\in \mathit{Span}(A_0)</math> | Let <math>\ A_0</math> be a pair of neighbors, and <math>\ x\in \mathit{Span}(A_0)</math> be an irrational number. Assume that pairs of neighbors <math>\ A_0,\dots,A_{n-1}</math> are already defined, and that they squeeze <math>\ x,</math> i.e. that <math>\ x\in\mathit{Span}(A_k)</math> for each <math>\ k=0,\dots,n-1.</math> Then we define <math>\ A_n</math> as the one of the two pairs: <math>\ \mathit{top}(A_{n-1})</math> or <math>\ \mathit{bot}(A_{n-1}),</math> which squeezes <math>\ x.</math> Thus for every positive irrational number we have obtained an infinite sequence of pairs of neighbors, each squeezing the given irrational number more and more. Thus for arbitrary irrational <math>\ x</math> there exist fractions of integers <math>\ \frac{s}{t},</math> with arbitrarily large denominators, such that | ||
:::<math>\left|x - \frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}\cdot t^2}</math> | |||
(see section '''''Hurwitz theorem'''''). | |||
If cases top-top and bot-bot happen only finitely many times then starting with an <math>\ n</math> we get an infinite alternating top-bot-top-bot-... sequence: | |||
:<math>A_{n+1} = \mathit{top}(A_n),\quad A_{n+2} = \mathit{bot}(A_{n+2}),\quad A_{n+3} = \mathit{top}(A_{n+1})\quad\dots</math> | |||
Then the new neighbor of the <math>\ A_{n+k}</math> pair (i.e. the median of the previous pair <math>\ A_{n+k-1}</math>) is equal to | |||
::<math>e_{k}\ :=\ \frac{F_{k+1}\cdot a + F_{k}\cdot b}{F_{k+1}\cdot c + F_{k}\cdot d}</math> | |||
for every <math>\ k=1,2,\dots,</math> where <math>\ F_{t}</math> are the [[Fibonacci number]]s, where | |||
:::<math>\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ :=\ A_n</math> | |||
It is known that | |||
:::<math>\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{F_{k+1}}{F_k}\ =\ \Phi\ :=\ \frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2}</math> | |||
hence | |||
::<math>x\ =\ \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}e_k\ =\ \frac{\Phi\cdot a+b}{\Phi\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
But if our infinite alternation has started with ''bot'' : | |||
:<math>A_{n+1} = \mathit{bot}(A_n),\quad A_{n+2} = \mathit{top}(A_{n+2}),\quad A_{n+3} = \mathit{bot}(A_{n+1})\quad\dots</math> | |||
Then we would have | |||
::<math>x\ =\ \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}e_k\ =\ \frac{a+\Phi\cdot b}{c+\Phi\cdot d}</math> | |||
| |||
=== Another proof of Hurwitz Theorem (further insight) === | |||
==== Reduction to x > 0 ==== | |||
Since | |||
:::<math>\left|(-x)-\frac{-s}{t}\right|\ =\ \left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|</math> | |||
it is enough to prove Hurwitz theorem for positive irrational numbers only. | |||
==== Two cases ==== | |||
Consider the sequence <math>\ \left(A_n\right)</math> of pairs of neighbors, which squeeze <math>\ x>0,</math> from the previous section. The case of the infinite alternation top-bot-top-bot-... has been proved already. In the remaining case the bot-bot-top or top-top-bot progressions appear infinitely many times, i.e. there are infinitely many non-negative integers <math>\ n</math> for which | |||
:<math> | :<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ \frac{a+b}{c+d}\ >\ \frac{a+2\cdot b}{c+2\cdot d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{a+3\cdot b}{c+3\cdot d}\ >\ \frac{b}{d}</math> | ||
or | |||
:<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ \frac{3\cdot a+b}{3\cdot c+d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}\ >\ \frac{a+b}{c+d}\ >\ \frac{b}{d}</math> | |||
holds, where | |||
:<math> | ::<math>\left(\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d}\right)\ :=\ A_n</math> | ||
| |||
Let <math>\ | ==== The top-top-bot case ==== | ||
Let's consider the latter top-top-bot case. Let <math>\ \xi := \frac{d}{c}.</math> The squeeze by neighbors: | |||
:::<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | :::<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | ||
shows that | |||
:<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{c\cdot(2\cdot c+d)}\ =\ \frac{1}{(2+\xi)}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}</math> | |||
This inequality provides the first insight (otherwise, we are not going to use it), so it deserves to be written cleanly as an implication: | |||
<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{(2+\xi)}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\quad\quad \Leftarrow\quad\quad\frac{a}{c}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
==== The relevant neighborhoods ==== | |||
Consider the next two pairs of neighbors, pair <math>\ A_{n+4}</math> and pair <math>\ A_{n+5},</math> which squeeze <math>\ x.</math> The relevant neighborhoods are: | |||
*<math>A\ :=\ \mathit{Span}(\frac{a}{c},\,\frac{3\cdot a+b}{3\cdot c+d})</math> | |||
*<math>B\ :=\ \mathit{Span}(\frac{3\cdot a+b}{3\cdot c+d},\,\frac{5\cdot a+2\cdot b}{5\cdot c+2\cdot d})</math> | |||
*<math>C\ :=\ \mathit{Span}(\frac{5\cdot a+2\cdot b}{5\cdot c+2\cdot d},\,\frac{7\cdot a+3\cdot b}{7\cdot c+3\cdot d})</math> | |||
*<math>D\ :=\ \mathit{Span}(\frac{7\cdot a+3\cdot b}{7\cdot c+3\cdot d},\,\frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d})</math> | |||
| |||
==== Neighborhood B ==== | |||
Let <math>\ x\in B.</math> Then | |||
:<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ \frac{3\cdot a+b}{3\cdot c+d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{5\cdot a+2\cdot b}{5\cdot c+2\cdot d}\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
and | and | ||
:::<math>x-\frac{b}{d}\ =\ \frac{\ | :<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{1}{c\cdot(3\cdot c+d)}+\frac{1}{(3\cdot c+d)\cdot(5\cdot c+2\cdot d)}</math> | ||
::<math>=\ \frac{2}{c\cdot(5\cdot c+2\cdot d)}\ =\ \frac{2}{(5+2\cdot\xi)}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}</math> | |||
Conclusion: | |||
<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{2}{5+2\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in B</math> | |||
==== Neighborhood C (first C-inequality) ==== | |||
Let <math>\ x\in C.</math> Then | |||
:<math>\frac{a}{c}\ >\ \frac{3\cdot a+b}{3\cdot c+d}\ >\ \frac{5\cdot a+2\cdot b}{5\cdot c+2\cdot d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{7\cdot a+3\cdot b}{7\cdot c+3\cdot d}</math> | |||
Thus using the calculation for neighborhood B also for C, we get | |||
:<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{2}{(5+2\cdot\xi)\cdot c^2}+\frac{1}{(5\cdot c+2\cdot d)\cdot(7\cdot c+3\cdot d)}</math> | |||
:<math>=\ \frac{3}{7+3\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}</math> | |||
First C-conclusion: | |||
<math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{3}{7+3\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in C</math> | |||
| |||
==== Neighborhood D ==== | |||
Let <math>\ x\in D,</math> i.e. | |||
:<math>\frac{7\cdot a+3\cdot b}{7\cdot c+3\cdot d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
Let <math>\alpha := 2\cdot a+b</math> and <math>\gamma := 2\cdot c+d = (2+\xi)\cdot c.</math> Then | |||
:<math>0\ <\ x-\frac{\alpha}{\gamma}\ =\ x-\frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
:<math><\ \frac{1}{(7\cdot c+3\cdot d)\cdot(2\cdot c+d)}\ =\ \frac{1}{(7+3\cdot\xi)\cdot c\cdot\gamma}</math> | |||
:<math>=\ \frac{2+\xi}{7+3\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}</math> | |||
Conclusion: | |||
<math>0\ <\ x-\frac{\alpha}{\gamma}\ <\ \frac{2+\xi}{7+3\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in D</math> | |||
==== Early yield (Hurwitz Theorem) ==== | |||
Let's impatiently indulge ourselves in already getting some crude results from the above hard work (:-). The above three BCD-conclusions instantly imply: | |||
* <math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{2}{5}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in B</math> | |||
* <math>0\ <\ \frac{a}{c}-x\ <\ \frac{3}{7}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in C</math> | |||
* <math>0\ <\ x-\frac{\alpha}{\gamma}\ <\ \frac{2}{7}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in D</math> | |||
Since | |||
:::<math>\max(\frac{2}{5},\,\frac{3}{7},\,\frac{2}{7})\ =\ \frac{3}{7}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}},</math> | |||
each occurrence of the top-top-bot subsequence, i.e. of equalities: | |||
:<math>A_{n+1} = \mathit{top}(A_n),\quad A_{n+2} = \mathit{top}(A_{n+1}),\quad A_{n+3} = \mathit{bot}(A_{n+2})\quad\dots</math> | |||
provides a fraction <math>\frac{s}{t}\in \mathit{Span}(A_{n+3}),</math> with integer numerator and natural denominator, such that | |||
:<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{3}{7}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}</math> | |||
: | The same is holds for every occurrence of the bot-bot-top sequence, which can be shown now mechanically by a proof similar to the proof of the top-top-bot case, or as follows: define the squeezing sequence of <math>\ -x</math> by: | ||
::<math>B_n := (\frac{-b}{d},\frac{-a}{c})</math> for <math>A_n = (\frac{a}{c},\frac{b}{d})</math> | |||
Let <math>\left(A_n,A_{n+1},A_{n+2},A_{n+3}\right)</math> be a bot-bot-top progression. Then <math>\left(B_n,B_{n+1},B_{n+2},B_{n+3}\right)</math> is a top-top-bot progression which squeezes <math>\ -x.</math> Thus | |||
:<math>\left|(-x)-\frac{u}{w}\right|\ <\ \frac{3}{7}\cdot\frac{1}{w^2}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot\frac{1}{w^2}</math> | |||
for certain <math>\frac{u}{w}\in \mathit{Span}(B_{n+3}),</math> with integer numerator and natural denominator. Then <math>\frac{s}{t}\in\mathit{Span}(A_{n+3}),</math> for <math>\ (s,t):=(-u,w),</math> satisfies: | |||
:<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{3}{7}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}</math> | |||
When another top-top-bot or bot-bot-top progression starts with a sufficiently large index <math>\ n',</math> then <math>\left|\mathit{Span}(A_{n'+3})\right| < \left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|,</math> which means that the respective new approximation <math>\frac{s'}{t'}\in\mathit{Span}(A_{n'+3})</math> is different. It follows that if there are infinitely many progressions top-top-bot or bot-bot-bot then there are infinitely many fractions <math>\ \frac{s}{t},</math> which satisfy the inequality above. Thus we have obtained the following version of '''Hurwitz theorem''': | |||
:'''Theorem''' Let <math>x\in\mathbb{R}\backslash\mathbb{Q}</math> be an arbitrary irrational number. Then inequality | |||
:*<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}</math> | |||
:holds for infinitely many fractions <math>\ \frac{s}{t},</math> with integer numerator and natural denominator. Furthermore, if the squeezing sequence of <math>\ x</math> does not eventually alternate top-bot-top-bot-... till infinity, i.e. if it has infinitely many top-top or bot-bot progressions, then | |||
:*<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{3}{7 | |||
}\cdot\frac{1}{t^2}</math> | |||
:holds for infinitely many fractions <math>\ \frac{s}{t},</math> with integer numerator and natural denominator. | |||
| | ||
=== | ==== Neighborhood C (second C-inequality) ==== | ||
Let <math>\ x\in C.</math> Then | |||
:<math>\frac{5\cdot a+2\cdot b}{5\cdot c+2\cdot d}\ >\ x\ >\ \frac{7\cdot a+3\cdot b}{7\cdot c+3\cdot d}\ >\ \frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
Thus, using the earlier conclusion for neighborhood <math>\ D</math> also for <math>\ C,</math> we obtain | |||
:<math>0\ <\ x-\frac{\alpha}{\gamma}\ =\ x-\frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}</math> | |||
:<math><\ \frac{1}{(5\cdot c+2\cdot d)\cdot(7\cdot c+3\cdot d)}\ +\ \frac{2+\xi}{(7+3\cdot\xi)\cdot \gamma^2}</math> | |||
:<math>=\ \frac{1}{(5+2\cdot\xi)\cdot(7+3\cdot\xi)}\cdot\frac{1}{c^2}\ +\ \frac{2+\xi}{(7+3\cdot\xi)\cdot \gamma^2}</math> | |||
:<math>=\ \frac{(2+\xi)^2}{(5+2\cdot\xi)\cdot(7+3\cdot\xi)}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}\ +\ \frac{2+\xi}{(7+3\cdot\xi)\cdot \gamma^2}</math> | |||
:<math>=\ \frac{2+\xi}{5+2\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}</math> | |||
Second C-conclusion: | |||
<math>0\ <\ x-\frac{\alpha}{\gamma}\ <\ \frac{2+\xi}{5+2\cdot\xi}\cdot\frac{1}{\gamma^2}\quad\quad\Leftarrow\quad\quad x\in C</math> | |||
==== Neigborhood C (the combined inequality) ==== | |||
Let: | |||
:::<math>\xi_0\ :=\ \frac{\sqrt{61}-7}{6}</math> | |||
Then | |||
::<math>\frac{3}{7+3\cdot \xi_0}\ =\ \frac{2+\xi_0}{5+2\cdot\xi_0}\ =\ \frac{\sqrt{61}-7}{2}</math> | |||
Thus for <math>\ \xi\ge\xi_0</math>: | |||
:<math>\frac{3}{7+3\cdot \xi}\ \le\ \frac{\sqrt{61}-7}{2}</math> | |||
and for <math>\ \xi\le\xi_0</math>: | |||
:<math>\frac{2+\xi}{5+2\cdot\xi}\ \le\ \frac{\sqrt{61}-7}{2}</math> | |||
It follows that | |||
for | * for one of the fractions <math>\frac{s}{t}\in\left\{\frac{a}{c},\,\frac{2\cdot a+b}{2\cdot c+d}\right\}</math> the following inequality holds for every <math>\ x\in C:</math> | ||
:::<math>\left| | :::<math>\left|x-\frac{s}{t}\right|\ <\ \frac{\sqrt{61}-7}{2}</math> | ||
(the choice of <math>\frac{s}{t}</math> depends on <math>\xi := \frac{d}{c}</math> ). | |||
| | ||
Line 420: | Line 748: | ||
and its length | and its length | ||
:::<math> | :::<math>diam(M)\ :=\ \mathit{rat}(v)-\mathit{rat}(w)</math> | ||
where <math>\ v</math> is the left, and <math>\ w</math> is the right column of matrix M — observe that the rational representation of the left column of a special matrix is always greater than the rational representation of the right column of the same special matrix. | where <math>\ v</math> is the left, and <math>\ w</math> is the right column of matrix M — observe that the rational representation of the left column of a special matrix is always greater than the rational representation of the right column of the same special matrix. | ||
Line 427: | Line 755: | ||
:::<math>M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]\in\mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)</math> | :::<math>M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]\in\mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)</math> | ||
then <math>\ | then <math>\ diam(M) = \frac{1}{c\cdot d}</math> |
Latest revision as of 07:40, 15 March 2021
The theory of diophantine approximations is a chapter of number theory, which in turn is a part of mathematics. It studies the approximations of real numbers by rational numbers. This article presents an elementary introduction to diophantine approximations, as well as an introduction to number theory via diophantine approximations.
Introduction
In the everyday life our civilization applies mostly (finite) decimal fractions Decimal fractions are used both as certain values, e.g. $5.85, and as approximations of the real numbers, e.g. However, the field of all rational numbers is much richer than the ring of the decimal fractions (or of the binary fractions which are used in the computer science). For instance, the famous approximation has denominator 113 much smaller than 105 but it provides a better approximation than the decimal one, which has five digits after the decimal point.
How well can real numbers (all of them or the special ones) be approximated by rational numbers? A typical Diophantine approximation result states:
Theorem Let be an arbitrary real number. Then
- is rational there exists a real number C > 0 such that
for arbitrary integers such that and
- (Adolph Hurwitz) is irrational there exist infinitely many pairs of integers such that and
Remark Implication of the first part of the theorem is a simple and satisfaction bringing exercise.
Notation
- — "equivalent by definition" (i.e. "if and only if");
- — "equals by definition";
- — "there exists";
- — "for all";
- — " is an element of set ";
- — the semiring of the natural numbers;
- — the semiring of the non-negative integers;
- — the ring of integers;
- — the field of rational numbers;
- — the field of real numbers;
- — " divides " (i.e. );
- — the greatest common divisor of integers and
The method of neighbors and median
In this section we will quickly obtain some results about approximating irrational numbers by rational. To this end we will not worry about the details of the difference between a rational number and a fraction (with integer numerator and denominator)—this will not cause any problems; fully crisp notions will be developed in the next sections, they will involve 2-dimensional vectors and 2x2 matrices. This section is still introductory. It is supposed to provide quick insight into the topic.
Definitions
Fractions and with integer numerators and natural denominators, are called neighbors (in the given order)
Fraction is called the top neighbor of the other, is called the bottom neighbor, and the interval is called neighborhood; thus a neighborhood is an open interval such that its endpoints are neighbors.
- If and are neighbors then ( i.e. ).
- Let Fractions and are neighbors fractions and are neighbors fractions and are neighbors.
Examples:
- Fractions and are neighbors for every positive integer
- Fractions and are neighbors for every positive integer
Thus it easily follows that for every positive irrational number there exists a pair of neighbors and with positive numerators and denominators, such that:
Definition A pair of neighboring fractions with integer numerators and natural denominators, is called a top pair Otherwise it is called a bottom pair.
Thus now we have notions of top/bottom neighbors and of top/bottom pairs of neighbors.
- Let be a pair of neighbors. Then is a top pair of neighbors, and is a bottom pair of neighbors.
First results
Theorem Let fractions and with integer numerators and natural denominators, be neighbors. Then
- if integers and are such that then
- the median is a bottom neighbor of and a top neighbor of
- let be an irrational number such that then
- and
- or
Proof Let then
- and
and
Multiplying this inequality by gives
which is the first part of our theorem.
The second part of the theorem is obtained by a simple calculation, straight from the definition of the neighbors.
The first inequality of the third part of the theorem is instant:
Next,
hence
and
i.e.
End of proof
Corollary Let fractions and with integer numerators and natural denominators, be neighbors. Then, if integers and are such that then either
or
Hurwitz theorem
- Let be an arbitrary irrational number. Then
- for infinitely many different
Lemma 1
Let Let Then:
or
Proof of lemma 1 It's easy to show that Thus the square of is positive. Now,
which means that we may write as follows:
i.e.
and lemma 1 follows. End of proof
Lemma 2
Let and Let and Furthermore, let fractions be neighbors, and let:
where is real. Then one of the following three inequalities holds:
Proof There are two cases along the inequalities of Lemma 1. Let's assume the first one, which is equivalent to:
Thus
which means that
Thus lemma 2 is proven when the first inequality of lemma 1 holds. By replacing in the above proof the lower case by the upper case we obtain the proof when the second inequality of lemma 1 holds.
End of proof (of lemma 2)
Lemma 2'
Let and Let and Furthermore, let fractions be neighbors, and let:
where is real. Then one of the following three inequalities holds:
Proof It's similar to the proof of lemma 2. Or one may apply lemma 2 to and , which would provide us with the respective fraction Then the required are given by
End of proof (of lemma 2')
Proof of Hurwitz theorem
When is irrational, then it is squeezed between infinitely many different pairs of neighbors (see part two of the theorem from the First results section). They provide infinitely many different required fractions (see lemma 2 and 2' above; but it is not claimed, nor true, that different pairs of neighbors provide different required fractions).
End of proof
Squeezing irrational numbers between neighbors
Let be an irrational number, We may always squeeze it between the extremal neighbours:
But if you don't like infinity (on the left above) then you may do one of the two things:
or
where in each of these two cases is a respective unique positive integer.
It was mentioned in the previous section (First results) that if fractions and with positive (or non-negative) integer numerators and denominators are neighbors then also the top and the bottom (bot for short) pair:
and
are both pairs of neighbors.
Let be a pair of neighbors, and be an irrational number. Assume that pairs of neighbors are already defined, and that they squeeze i.e. that for each Then we define as the one of the two pairs: or which squeezes Thus for every positive irrational number we have obtained an infinite sequence of pairs of neighbors, each squeezing the given irrational number more and more. Thus for arbitrary irrational there exist fractions of integers with arbitrarily large denominators, such that
(see section Hurwitz theorem).
If cases top-top and bot-bot happen only finitely many times then starting with an we get an infinite alternating top-bot-top-bot-... sequence:
Then the new neighbor of the pair (i.e. the median of the previous pair ) is equal to
for every where are the Fibonacci numbers, where
It is known that
hence
But if our infinite alternation has started with bot :
Then we would have
Another proof of Hurwitz Theorem (further insight)
Reduction to x > 0
Since
it is enough to prove Hurwitz theorem for positive irrational numbers only.
Two cases
Consider the sequence of pairs of neighbors, which squeeze from the previous section. The case of the infinite alternation top-bot-top-bot-... has been proved already. In the remaining case the bot-bot-top or top-top-bot progressions appear infinitely many times, i.e. there are infinitely many non-negative integers for which
or
holds, where
The top-top-bot case
Let's consider the latter top-top-bot case. Let The squeeze by neighbors:
shows that
This inequality provides the first insight (otherwise, we are not going to use it), so it deserves to be written cleanly as an implication:
The relevant neighborhoods
Consider the next two pairs of neighbors, pair and pair which squeeze The relevant neighborhoods are:
Neighborhood B
Let Then
and
Conclusion:
Neighborhood C (first C-inequality)
Let Then
Thus using the calculation for neighborhood B also for C, we get
First C-conclusion:
Neighborhood D
Let i.e.
Let and Then
Conclusion:
Early yield (Hurwitz Theorem)
Let's impatiently indulge ourselves in already getting some crude results from the above hard work (:-). The above three BCD-conclusions instantly imply:
Since
each occurrence of the top-top-bot subsequence, i.e. of equalities:
provides a fraction with integer numerator and natural denominator, such that
The same is holds for every occurrence of the bot-bot-top sequence, which can be shown now mechanically by a proof similar to the proof of the top-top-bot case, or as follows: define the squeezing sequence of by:
- for
Let be a bot-bot-top progression. Then is a top-top-bot progression which squeezes Thus
for certain with integer numerator and natural denominator. Then for satisfies:
When another top-top-bot or bot-bot-top progression starts with a sufficiently large index then which means that the respective new approximation is different. It follows that if there are infinitely many progressions top-top-bot or bot-bot-bot then there are infinitely many fractions which satisfy the inequality above. Thus we have obtained the following version of Hurwitz theorem:
- Theorem Let be an arbitrary irrational number. Then inequality
- holds for infinitely many fractions with integer numerator and natural denominator. Furthermore, if the squeezing sequence of does not eventually alternate top-bot-top-bot-... till infinity, i.e. if it has infinitely many top-top or bot-bot progressions, then
- holds for infinitely many fractions with integer numerator and natural denominator.
Neighborhood C (second C-inequality)
Let Then
Thus, using the earlier conclusion for neighborhood also for we obtain
Second C-conclusion:
Neigborhood C (the combined inequality)
Let:
Then
Thus for :
and for :
It follows that
- for one of the fractions the following inequality holds for every
(the choice of depends on ).
Divisibility
Definition Integer is divisible by integer
Symbolically:
When is divisible by then we also say that is a divisor of or that divides
- The only integer divisible by is (i.e. is a divisor only of ).
- is divisible by every integer.
- is the only positive divisor of
- Every integer is divisible by (and by ).
Remark The above three properties show that the relation of divisibility is a partial order in the set of natural number and also in — is its minimal, and is its maximal element.
Relatively prime pairs of integers
Definition Integers and are relatively prime is their only common positive divisor.
- Integers and are relatively prime
- is relatively prime with every integer.
- If and are relatively prime then also and are relatively prime.
- Theorem 1 If are such that two of them are relatively prime and then any two of them are relatively prime.
- Corollary If and are relatively prime then also and are relatively prime.
Now, let's define inductively a table odd integers:
as follows:
- and
- for
- for
for every
The top of this table looks as follows:
- 0 1
- 0 1 1
- 0 1 1 2 1
- 0 1 1 2 1 3 2 3 1
- 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 4 3 5 2 5 3 4 1
etc.
- Theorem 2
- Every pair of neighboring elements of the table, and is relatively prime.
- For every pair of relatively prime, non-negative integers and there exist indices and non-negative such that:
Proof Of course the pair
is relatively prime; and the inductive proof of the first statement of Theorem 2 is now instant thanks to Theorem 1 above.
Now let and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ b} be a pair of relatively prime, non-negative integers. If Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ a+b=1} then Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \{a, b\}=\{0,1\}=\{\nu_{0,0},\nu_{0,1}\},} and the second part of the theorem holds. Continuing this unductive proof, let's assume that Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ a+b>1.} Then Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \min(a,b) > 0.} Thus
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \max(a,b) < a+b}
But integers Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ c := \min(a,b)} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ d := |a-b|} are relatively prime (see Corollary above), and
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle c+d\ =\ max(a,b)\ <\ a+b}
hence, by induction,
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \{c,d\}\ =\ \{\nu_{k,n},\nu_{k,n+1}\}}
for certain indices Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle k\in\mathbb{Z}_+} and non-negative Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ n<2^k.} Furthermore:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \{a,b\}\ =\ \{\min(a,b), \max(a,b)\}}
It follows that one of the two options holds:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \{a,b\}\ =\ \{\nu_{k+1,2\cdot n},\nu_{k+1,2\cdot n+1}\}}
or
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \{a,b\}\ =\ \{\nu_{k+1,2\cdot n+1},\nu_{k+1,2\cdot n+2}\}}
End of proof
Let's note also, that
where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ F_r}
is the r-th Fibonacci number.
Matrix monoid Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)}
Definition 1 Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)} is the set of all matrices
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]}
such that Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{Z}_+,} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \det(M) = 1,} where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \det(M) := a\cdot d - b\cdot c.} Such matrices (and their columns and rows) will be called special.
- If
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]\in\mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)}
then Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ a,d > 0,} and each of the columns and rows of M, i.e. each of the four pairs Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (x,y) \in \{a,d\}\times \{b,c\},\ } is relatively prime.
Obviously, the identity matrix
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{I}\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]}
belongs to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2).} Furthermore, Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)} is a monoid with respect to the matrix multiplication.
Example The upper matrix and the lower matrix are defined respectively as follows:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{U}\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 1\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{L}\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 0\\ 1 & 1\end{array}\right]}
Obviously Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ \mathcal{U},\mathcal{L}\in \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+,2).} When they act on the right on a matrix M (by multipliplying M by itself), then they leave respectively the left or right column of M intact:
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\cdot \mathcal{U}\ =\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & a+b\\ c & c+d\end{array}\right]}
and
Definition 2 Vectors
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{c}a\\ c\end{array}\right]} and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{c}b\\ d\end{array}\right]}
where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{Z}_+,} are called neighbors (in that order) Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow} matrix formed by these vectors
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]}
belongs to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2).} Then the left (resp. right) column is called the left (resp. right) neighbor.
Rational representation
With every vector
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle v\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{c}a\\ c\end{array}\right]}
such that Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ c\ne 0,} let's associate a rational number
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{rat}(v)\ :=\ \frac{a}{c}}
Also, let
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{rat}(v_{\infty})\ :=\ \infty}
for
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle v_{\infty}\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{c}1\\ 0\end{array}\right]}
Furthermore, with every matrix Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\in \mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+,2),} let's associate the real open interval
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{span}(M)\ :=\ (\mathit{rat}(w);\mathit{rat}(v))}
and its length
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle diam(M)\ :=\ \mathit{rat}(v)-\mathit{rat}(w)}
where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ v} is the left, and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \ w} is the right column of matrix M — observe that the rational representation of the left column of a special matrix is always greater than the rational representation of the right column of the same special matrix.
- If
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle M\ :=\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right]\in\mathit{SO}(\mathbb{Z}_+, 2)}
then