CZ Talk:Wiki-converting: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


# Test One: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test One|http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from MS Word]].
# Test One: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test One|http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from MS Word]].
# Test Two: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Two|http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from OpenOffice]].
# Test Two: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Two|http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from OpenOffice]].
# Test Three: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Three|Using Wiki2Text export from OpenOffice]].
# Test Three: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Three|Using Wiki2Text export from OpenOffice]].
# Test Four: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Four|Using Odt2Wiki export from OpenOffice]].
# Test Four: [[CZ_Talk:Wiki-converting/Test Four|Using Odt2Wiki export from OpenOffice]].



Revision as of 15:25, 29 December 2007

I took an old paper and ran four tests on it with available converting tools:

  1. Test One: http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from MS Word.
  2. Test Two: http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from OpenOffice.
  3. Test Three: Using Wiki2Text export from OpenOffice.
  4. Test Four: Using Odt2Wiki export from OpenOffice.

As things turn out, results go from worst to best. Odt2Wiki with OOo provides the best result.

Odt2Wiki is available at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Odt2Wiki and OpenOffice is available at http://www.openoffice.org - both are free.

Stephen Ewen 14:23, 29 December 2007 (CST)