CZ Talk:Wiki-converting: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
As things turn out, results go from worst to best.  Odt2Wiki with OOo provides the best result.   
As things turn out, results go from worst to best.  Odt2Wiki with OOo provides the best result.   


Odt2Wiki is available at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Odt2Wiki and OpenOffice is available at http://www.openoffice.org - both a free.
Odt2Wiki is available at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Odt2Wiki and OpenOffice is available at http://www.openoffice.org - both are free.


[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:23, 29 December 2007 (CST)
[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:23, 29 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 15:25, 29 December 2007

I took an old paper and ran four tests on it with available converting tools:

  1. Test One: http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from MS Word.
  1. Test Two: http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki after saving to HTML from OpenOffice.
  1. Test Three: Using Wiki2Text export from OpenOffice.
  1. Test Four: Using Odt2Wiki export from OpenOffice.

As things turn out, results go from worst to best. Odt2Wiki with OOo provides the best result.

Odt2Wiki is available at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Odt2Wiki and OpenOffice is available at http://www.openoffice.org - both are free.

Stephen Ewen 14:23, 29 December 2007 (CST)